Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    Veteran Member grnspot110's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,341
    Location
    MO
    Tractor
    John Deere 790, 420, 314, "L/60" Custom & 70 I

    Default Re: Has anoyne ever traded down to a smaller tractor?

    I did, but I was also upgrading as my needs have changed. I sold my 1958 JD 520 row crop (34 HP) & bought a 2004 JD 790 Compact (27 HP). Fits my current needs much better! ~~ grnspot

  2. #12
    Gold Member ddb123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    481
    Location
    Southwest MO
    Tractor
    Kubota L3540

    Default

    Right now I have a 45 hp L4300. It is 2 wheel drive and unloaded tires. I'm thinking that a lower hp 4 wheel drive machine would engage the ground as well (or better) than now, and definitely all I need it to do. As far as loader work, the heaviest work I do with it by far is load and unload implements, and my heaviest implement (6 ft brush hog) was loaded into my trailer with a 25 hp New Holland loader. Watching that and seeing what some people on here do with much smaller machines, and a buddy of mine who has a B7800, has me thinking that I would be well served by a 4wd tractor in the low- to mid-30 hp range, maybe as small as a B3200 even. Using my tractor for a few hours straight makes me wish I had a tilt wheel, HST, more comfortable station, etc. Sure would save some money come upgrade time if I could lower the hp requirements. That and, as I said, a smaller machine could really help in the woods and with storage. But would I instantly regret the loss of hp is my worry. Since I don't push my tractor now (except traction sometimes -- gotta load those tires) I'm thinking I would be more than happy with the capabilities of a B3300SU or L3240.
    Kubota L3540 HST
    Kubota L4300 Gear *gone!*
    Ford F-350 6.9L diesel

  3. #13
    Veteran Member magicheater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,668
    Location
    central Wisconsin
    Tractor
    Kubota B7800, B26 TLB

    Default Re: Has anoyne ever traded down to a smaller tractor?

    A long while back I down sized from an Oliver 1600 65 H.P. gas tractor to an L4350 kubota diesel (45H.P.) 4x4. (Actually up-sized) Difference of night and day! Recently I added a B7800 w/HST, now I seldom use the big guy, not once this winter. Only time I need the bigger tractor is for lift capacity of the loader or pure grunt. I have found that the nimbleness of the HST and the smaller tractor play a bigger part in the usage. I would say that your needs drives the decision and at times it is after you buy that you realize that your choice was to big or too small. FWIW.
    Working to increase the scope of the small tractor experience, one quick attach at a time.

  4. #14
    Super Member JDgreen227's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    7,745
    Location
    Central Michigan
    Tractor
    4210 MFWD Ehydro--'89 JD 318

    Default Re: Has anoyne ever traded down to a smaller tractor?

    Before I purchased my first CUT, I was torn between the Deere 4210 and 4310, the bigger Deere offered more power and a higher lift height and capacity with the FEL, but I really would have only needed those once in a while, and because after my landscaping work would be done, 90% of my time would be mowing hours. So I went with the 4210. It's lighter, a bit shorter, turns sharper, and the smaller engine is remarkably fuel efficient and I am happy with my choice. Not likely I would trade down to a smaller model though unless I moved to a smaller property.
    Rather than worry about the things you want but don't have, be grateful for the things you don't want and don't have.

    I didn't plan to do much of anything today, but by noon I was almost half done.

  5. #15
    Platinum Member jpm1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    576
    Location
    Panther Lake, Oswego County New York
    Tractor
    Mahindra 2810 HST, Kioti DK35SE HST

    Default Re: Has anoyne ever traded down to a smaller tractor?

    ddb123

    Years ago i had 2 Belarus 60 hp tractors. One with a loader, one without. These were great tractors but extremely heavy. When we sold the cows, i had little use for big heavy tractors and sold them and started with a Mahindra 2810HST. My dad didn't like the idea at the time but learned quickly that i could do anything with my new smaller tractor that the big tractor could do, it just took a couple of trips more with the loader ect. We found out quickly that it was quicker with the smaller tractor because there was less ground disturbance to repair when the job was done. it just takes a little gittin use to. Remember its not the size of the hook you use, it's how you wiggle the worm! .. .John
    Lord, Help me to be the man my dog thinks i am . . .John. Mahindra 2810HST, 108H loader with Quick tach buckets and forks. Kioti DK35SE HST with loader, Hyd. top link and second set of rear remotes, 60" and 66" buckets, Kubota 900 RTV and a bunch of other good stuff
    Buy more equipment, It makes life easier.!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Buying the first Test Tractor
    By JOHNTHOMAS in forum Kubota Buying/Pricing
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 04-12-2013, 08:03 AM
  2. Bad Oil New Tractor
    By broker than broke in forum Buying/Pricing/Comparisons
    Replies: 197
    Last Post: 12-23-2010, 08:25 PM
  3. Poll: How many traded before finding the "right" tractor?
    By bxowner in forum Kubota Buying/Pricing
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 12-24-2008, 05:10 AM
  4. Selling 5225 to get smaller tractor
    By Ridgeman in forum John Deere Buying/Pricing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-17-2007, 06:37 PM
  5. GC-2310 Update -- The latest and greatest
    By Mike_in_Okla in forum Massey Ferguson Owning/Operating
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 03-19-2006, 01:51 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
© 2014 TractorByNet.com. TractorByNet is a registered trademark of IMC Digital Universe, Inc. Other trademarks on this page are the property of their respective owners.