PaulK
Member
What is the exact meaning of \"rated engine speed\"?
I'd like to learn more about the parameters involved when a company designates a specific engine RPM as the "rated speed".
Specifically, my Kubota B21 has a rated engine speed of 2600 RPMs. That speed is used for tests of other components in the system. The hydraulic pump test is performed at "the rated speed of 2600 RPM" pressure of 1991 PSI and oil at 122F. Tests for the backhoe are calibrated at 2600 RPM. The literature indicates that the backhoe can be run at rated speed and slowed to 2000 RPM if noise is a problem, while 1800 RPM is the slowest permissible engine speed for the backhoe.
If rated speed is the standard operating speed for implements, is it the most efficient speed? I usually run my machine at 1800-1900 RPMs because the power I get at 2200 RPMs is not that much more. I know that there have been numerous discussions on this topic, i.e. "what RPMs are you running"?
My gut feeling when in the drivers seat and listening to 2600 RPMs is that it is very high. Obviously, since I am not conditioned to that rev, it will seem high. My naive and wimpy assessment of "rated speed" is that it is the highest sustained speed that the engine can take. Could it be that the engine is actually "happier" to be running at rated speed and could withstand a few hundred more RPMs if needed and as long as it isn't done in hot conditions or to the point where it overheats?
I'm interested in the history of the term "rated engine speed" as a calibration tool. Our car tires have a weight rating that is probably half of the weight that they can actually withstand. Does an engine mfgr find a speed that it determines as "most efficient", or "highest RPM without breaking", etc. and then regard this as a rated speed? Just curious about the procedure and rating parameters.
Paul
I'd like to learn more about the parameters involved when a company designates a specific engine RPM as the "rated speed".
Specifically, my Kubota B21 has a rated engine speed of 2600 RPMs. That speed is used for tests of other components in the system. The hydraulic pump test is performed at "the rated speed of 2600 RPM" pressure of 1991 PSI and oil at 122F. Tests for the backhoe are calibrated at 2600 RPM. The literature indicates that the backhoe can be run at rated speed and slowed to 2000 RPM if noise is a problem, while 1800 RPM is the slowest permissible engine speed for the backhoe.
If rated speed is the standard operating speed for implements, is it the most efficient speed? I usually run my machine at 1800-1900 RPMs because the power I get at 2200 RPMs is not that much more. I know that there have been numerous discussions on this topic, i.e. "what RPMs are you running"?
My gut feeling when in the drivers seat and listening to 2600 RPMs is that it is very high. Obviously, since I am not conditioned to that rev, it will seem high. My naive and wimpy assessment of "rated speed" is that it is the highest sustained speed that the engine can take. Could it be that the engine is actually "happier" to be running at rated speed and could withstand a few hundred more RPMs if needed and as long as it isn't done in hot conditions or to the point where it overheats?
I'm interested in the history of the term "rated engine speed" as a calibration tool. Our car tires have a weight rating that is probably half of the weight that they can actually withstand. Does an engine mfgr find a speed that it determines as "most efficient", or "highest RPM without breaking", etc. and then regard this as a rated speed? Just curious about the procedure and rating parameters.
Paul