I am sorry to learn that Chris had a meltdown so early in his PT ownership, and I totally understand his frustration in dealing with finger pointing.
A CEO, and a former commanding officer on a nuclear attack submarine, put it succinctly; "If you are the XO, and are asleep while someone else is piloting the boat, and it runs aground, it is your fault."
Being caught in finger pointing is not pleasant, nor is the thought that your brand new baby is flawed. That said, nothing is perfect, and mean time between failures is a statistical distribution. Some units won't fail for 5,000 hours (my old Saab comes to mind), while others will experience major failures early in life.
I can definitely empathize with Chris.
I had a wheel motor blow a seal at 5.2 hours, spraying the engine compartment, muffler, oil cooler, everything with oil, and dumping a couple of quarts of oil on the ground.
It was nearly a Sedgewick, and it made me appreciate how fast you could have a major fire, and how big the fire extinguisher needs to be.
After I found the problem, the Power-trac response was to send out a replacement wheel motor. I changed the motors out, and sent it back. My shipping cost to be credited to future purchases from PT.
Was Terry very helpful about it? Definitely.
Did PT send an instruction sheet on how to do it? No.
Did I have to ask PT to send hose plugs? Yes.
Overall, do I think it was a great response? No.
Was it what they had legally agreed to do? Yes.
Did I know that it was all that they would do before I bought the tractor? Yes.
Was it one of my primary reservations with buying a PT? Yes.
In the end, before purchasing a PT, I decided that
A) I couldn't afford the Swiss superior engineered version, or its service contract.
B) I could probably fix most of what would break on the tractor.
C) my view was that the factory delivered tractor is really just a starting framework for building the right tractor for me.
Reading TBN, you can tell that for various people the tractors work great, as is. While for others, the tractors need substantial modifications to do routine things, and other users make major changes and improvements. The creativity of the group here never ceases to impress me. Not to mention the willingness to pick up a welding torch and have at it.
The state of the PT reminds me of the auto industry in the 1960s (or the tractor industry). Cars were largely assembled, rather than designed, and certainly not engineered on anything but the simplest dimensions. As a result, owners could make enormously better cars at home, with simple tools and modifications. I remember our family having two cars in our driveway that differed by a factor of 2.5 in HP/volume, and a factor of 3.5 in mpg. The comfort and handling were not even remotely comparable. The Deutz tractor that a neighbor bought was 15% more fuel efficient, which may not sound like much, but in marginal farming, it was huge.
In concrete terms, we own three vehicles today; one is unmodified from the factory with 80k miles, one, @110k, has had some minor electrical modifications put in by me (autodimming headlights and a cell phone amplifier), and one, @380k miles, has had large sections of the electrical system modified and replaced, and the fuel system and drivetrain altered, becuase it needed it. For the latter, I knew enough to design better than the original engineers, while for the first one, I don't know enough to improve on the original for our use.
For me, it is the same with PT. I didn't think it was perfect when I bought it, but it was a starting point, and it had capabilities that other tractors didn't have, and couldn't be user engineered in. e.g. 30 degree cross slope motion.
As an aside, I help start companies for a living, and I did do a quick evaluation of Power-Trac while I was there.
Are there a number of significant items that they could do better? Yes.
Could I advise PT on how to be more successful, more competitive? Yes.
Did they show any signs that they wanted to hear the advice? No.
And that, as they say, is the end of story.
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."
Sure, I'd love to see Ford/Chrysler/GM/US company X be better, more effective, more profitable, and be better places to work, but they have to want to change before they can improve. On a personal level, I wouldn't wish a poorly run, managed company on anyone, whether a customer, employee or owner.
Bonus points to identifying Eddie D. Reynolds.
All the best,
Peter