</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Appearance "is not a factor at all" for him /forums/images/graemlins/crazy.gif Not sure why this would be the case for a person's home living space, but to each his own. )</font>
Jim, Having built the most ornate structures for the most wealthy people on this globe over many years, I can tell you looks don't much matter to me either. It's all relative. I'm doing all the ornate millwork in an $18M home in DC right now that probably makes all our housing look like garbage in the relative sense. I've seen so much of this it's really just the function that matters to me. I'm glad to feed these fools egos, but the property either does or doesn't work. If appearance is your thing then it won't "work" if it ain't cute. There is nothing wrong with that. Just like there's nothing wrong with the posters question on cost. Yeah, he can build a georgous shed/garage as temporary quarters, but if it adds two years to the launch on the house construction it wont "work" for him.
Thought I'd throw this out cause we are all guilty of caring excessively about appearance. In the end it's probably not very important.