Article From Reuter's: Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy

   / Article From Reuter's: Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy #1  

jeff9366

Super Star Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
12,386
Location
Alachua County, North-Central Florida
Tractor
Kubota Tractor Loader L3560 HST+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3,700 pounds bare tractor, 5,400 pounds operating weight, 37 horsepower
Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy

By Jo Winterbottom and P.J. Huffstutter
CHICAGO (Reuters) - Across the U.S. Midwest, the plunge in grain prices to near four-year lows is pitting landowners determined to sustain rental incomes against farmer tenants worried about making rent payments because their revenues are squeezed.
Some grain farmers already see the burden as too big. They are taking an extreme step, one not widely seen since the 1980s: breaching lease contracts, reducing how much land they will sow this spring and risking years-long legal battles with landlords.
The tensions add to other signs the agricultural boom that the U.S. grain farming sector has enjoyed for a decade is over. On Friday, tractor maker John Deere (DE.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) cut its profit forecast citing falling sales caused by lower farm income and grain prices.
Many rent payments which vary from a few thousand dollars for a tiny farm to millions for a major operation are due on March 1, just weeks after the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) estimated net farm income, which peaked at $129 billion in 2013, could slide by almost a third this year to $74 billion.
The costs of inputs, such as fertilizer and seeds, are remaining stubbornly high, the strong dollar is souring exports and grain prices are expected to stay low.
How many people are walking away from leases they had committed to is not known. In Iowa, the nation's top corn and soybean producer, one real estate expert says that out of the estimated 100,000 farmland leases in the state, 1,000 or more could be breached by this spring.
The stakes are high because huge swaths of agricultural land are leased: As of 2012, in the majority of counties in the Midwest Corn Belt and the grain-growing Plains, at least 40 percent of farmland was leased or rented out, USDA data shows.
"It's hard to know where the bottom is on this," said David Miller, Iowa Farm Bureau's director of research and commodity services.
SIGNS OF TROUBLE
Grain production is, however, unlikely to be affected in any major way yet as landowners will rather have someone working their land, even at reduced rates, than let it lie fallow.
But prolonged weakness in the farm economy could send ripples far and wide: as farms consolidate, "there would be fewer machinery dealers, fewer elevators, and so-on through the rural economy," said Craig Dobbins, professor of agricultural economics at Purdue University.
Possibly also fewer new farmers.
Jon Sparks farms about 1,400 acres of family land and rented ground in Indiana. His nephew wants to return to work on the farm but margins are tight and land rents high. Sparks cannot make it work financially.
"We can't grow without overextending ourselves," Sparks said. "I don't know what to do."
Landowners are reluctant to cut rents. Some are retirees who partly rely on the rental income from the land they once farmed, and the rising number of realty investors want to maintain returns. Landlords have also seen tenants spend on new machinery and buildings during the boom and feel renters should still be able to afford lease payments.
"As cash rent collections start this spring, I expect to see more farm operators who have had difficulty acquiring adequate financing either let leases go or try and renegotiate terms," said Jim Farrell, president of Farmers National Co, which manages about 4,900 farms across 24 states for land-owners.
Take an 80-acre (32 hectare) farm in Madison County, Iowa, owned by a client of Peoples Company, a farmland manager. The farmer who rented the land at $375 an acre last year offered $315 for this year, said Steve Bruere, president of the company. The owner turned him down, and rented it to a neighbor for $325 -- plus a hefty bonus if gross income tops $750.
There are growing numbers of other examples. Miller, of the Iowa Farm Bureau, said he learned about a farmer near Marshalltown, in central Iowa, who had walked away from 650 acres (263 hectares) of crop ground because he could not pay the rent. Just days later, he was told a north-central Iowa farmer breached his lease on 6,500 acres.
COURTS OR LOANS
Concern about broken leases has some landlords reviewing legal options, according to Roger A. McEowen, director of the Iowa State University Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation. His staff began fielding phone calls from nervous landowners last autumn.
One catch is that many landlords never thought to file the paperwork to put a lien on their tenants' assets. That means landowners "can't go grab anything off the farm if the tenant doesn't pay," McEowen said. "It also means that they're going to be behind the bank."
Still, farmers could have a tough time walking away from their leases, said Kelvin Leibold, a farm management specialist at Iowa State University extension.
"People want their money. They want to get paid. I expect we will see some cases going to court over this," he added.
To avoid such a scenario, farmers have begun turning to banks for loans that will help fund operations and conserve their cash. Operating loans for farmers jumped 37 percent in the fourth quarter of 2014 over a year ago to $54 billion, according to survey-based estimates in the Kansas City Federal Reserve bank's latest Agricultural Finance Databook.
Loans with an undefined purpose -- which might be used for rents, according to the bank's assistant vice-president Nathan Kauffman -- nearly doubled in the fourth quarter of 2014 from a year earlier to $25 billion.
Total non-real estate farm loan volumes jumped more than 50 percent for the quarter, to $112 billion.
"It's all about working capital and bankers are stressing working capital," said Sam Miller, managing director of agricultural banking at BMO Harris Bank. "Liquidity has tightened up considerably in the last year."
(Editing by Tomasz Janowski)
 
Last edited:
   / Article From Reuter's: Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy #2  
Interesting. The growth of realty investors/REITs is not going to help matters.

I think share cropping is more equitable and realistic: share the expenses, profits and losses. I think it leads to better long-term care of the land too. Demanding rents when they can't be had while farmland is priced out of reach for individuals sounds feudal.
 
   / Article From Reuter's: Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy #3  
Thanks for posting this interesting article.


I think share cropping is more equitable and realistic: share the expenses, profits and losses. I think it leads to better long-term care of the land too. Demanding rents when they can't be had while farmland is priced out of reach for individuals sounds feudal.

Surely you have those days when you wonder "What are the advantages/disadvantages of crop share versus cash rental of farmland"? Then you come to the same old realization, "I need the need the advice of an economist. An economist would be able to answer my question."

As ever you would be correct. See https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/ncr/ncr-105-w.html.

Steve

PS -- A fair amount of the rented cropland in the area of my farm is owned by elderly folks, including several widows. I suspect that they would have little interest in crop share leases.

PSS -- For those interested, you can look up average cash rents in your county at USDA/NASS QuickStats Ad-hoc Query Tool
 
Last edited:
   / Article From Reuter's: Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy #4  
Surely you have those days when you wonder "What are the advantages/disadvantages of crop share versus cash rental of farmland"? Then you come to the same old realization, "I need the need the advice of an economist. An economist would be able to answer my question."

As ever you would be correct. See https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/ncr/ncr-105-w.html.

Steve

PS -- A fair amount of the rented cropland in the area of my farm is owned by elderly folks, including several widows. I suspect that they would have little interest in crop share leases.

PSS -- For those interested, you can look up average cash rents in your county at USDA/NASS QuickStats Ad-hoc Query Tool

I'm sure those retirees do put great value on a known income while not getting overly involved with the technical aspects of farming. On the other hand, they do own farmland, and farming for income has inherent risks. Desiring to off-load those risks to someone else, is that not a form of rent-seeking?

Perhaps I have quaint perceptions but the trend we are on removes more and more people from a meaningful bond with the land itself. We are going/have gone from "this land is my farm, my pride, my sustenance, and my children's wealth" to "this land is a corporate asset." The social and sustainability issues surrounding that transformation are significant.
 
   / Article From Reuter's: Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy #5  
From my family's experience, cash rent and shares both have disadvantages. We liked shares because of the risk sharing, but after a bad year, the owners would tend to panic and try to find another farmer (I suppose one that could control the weather.) After a good year on cash rent, the owner would try to raise rates because we were making so much money. :confused:
 
   / Article From Reuter's: Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy #6  
I'm sure those retirees do put great value on a known income while not getting overly involved with the technical aspects of farming. On the other hand, they do own farmland, and farming for income has inherent risks. Desiring to off-load those risks to someone else, is that not a form of rent-seeking?

Perhaps I have quaint perceptions but the trend we are on removes more and more people from a meaningful bond with the land itself. We are going/have gone from "this land is my farm, my pride, my sustenance, and my children's wealth" to "this land is a corporate asset." The social and sustainability issues surrounding that transformation are significant.

Dave, I think that ship sailed long ago. Very few farmers left around here, but they are doing enormous amounts of land. Lots of hi tech equipment allows fewer hours per acre, and they view land as a asset, they will farm it or develop it, whichever works best.
 
   / Article From Reuter's: Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy #7  
Interesting. The growth of realty investors/REITs is not going to help matters.

I think share cropping is more equitable and realistic: share the expenses, profits and losses. I think it leads to better long-term care of the land too. Demanding rents when they can't be had while farmland is priced out of reach for individuals sounds feudal.


Feudal? Yeah, but that is the way this country is going. As far as the farmer with 1400 acres, guys around here crop farm that much around here, and have a second job. It isn't going to sustain 2 families. It's a big biz, and I have zero sympathy for folks crying about how high the rent is. The same folks usually don't have sympathy for anybody else.
 
   / Article From Reuter's: Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy #8  
In my area cash rent varies from $125 to $275 an acre. I don't know of any crop share renting. 20 years ago the majority was crop sharing.

Of my 100 acres tillable it's in three basic categories.

20 acres is hayground that I rent to my neighbor on shares. He does all the work harvesting the hay and pays me market value per bale for half. Over the past 4-5 years it's averaged $50 per acre income to me. I don't want this land tilled due to the risk of high erosion. So I'm content to keep it groomed so trees and noxious weeds don't take over with no effort on my part.

40 acres is in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). It's in two different contracts. One that was signed 8 years ago pays $87 per acre on a 10 year contract. One that was signed 2 years ago pays $137 per acre on a 10 year contract.

I cash rent the remaining 40 acres to a very large farmer/friend/neighbor. He pays me $125 p/acre after the crop comes out in the Fall. I completely trust him and let him guide me with no worries.

He told me last year I should consider putting those acres into the CRP program. Last year's high bid was $167 p/acre for CRP. This Spring he will plant corn. In May I'll make an attempt to sign those acres into CRP. I plan to bid it in at $170 p/acre. Pretty sure it'll get accepted. Neither I nor my Renter can see anyway that could be a loss of future income.

He thinks the cash rent prices are over-inflated. He also says, as the article above says, this is all going to change. Cash rent prices are going to drop back to a reasonable rate. Our area is not considered to be rich farmland. Most of this area is classified as HEL(Highly Erodeable Land) land by the governmental Farm Services Agency. I agree with his prediction. I would be very content to bid in my cropland at $170 p/acre on a 10 year contract.

If for some reason if the FSA ever decides to discontinue the CRP program I'll simply go back to cash renting or share crop renting all of my tillable land to my current Renter. He currently plants 25,000 acres per year. He is not going anywhere. I'll never see a situation where I have to "hunt" him down for my money. I'm very blessed to have him as a partner.
 
   / Article From Reuter's: Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy #9  
I'm sure those retirees do put great value on a known income while not getting overly involved with the technical aspects of farming. On the other hand, they do own farmland, and farming for income has inherent risks. Desiring to off-load those risks to someone else, is that not a form of rent-seeking?

Not insofar as the term "rent-seeking" is used by economists. We use that term to describe activities of individuals, special interest groups, corporations, unions, etc. who are trying to obtain benefits through the political system that they can not obtain through the market.

A better term might be "privilege seeking."

Steve
 
Last edited:
   / Article From Reuter's: Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy #10  
Dave, I think that ship sailed long ago. Very few farmers left around here, but they are doing enormous amounts of land. Lots of hi tech equipment allows fewer hours per acre, and they view land as a asset, they will farm it or develop it, whichever works best.

I don't disagree, but it worries me that we have moved in the wrong direction. Considering all the programs, subsidies and loan guarantees, it's not cheap overall and the price of groceries have gone up as the food quality has gone down.

Steve's link is likely a good guide and worksheet on how to set-up and evaluate a rent or crop share lease but it does not address sustainability. That's certainly not a knock on Steve, just an observation.

When farmland is seen as an asset in an investment portfolio, who is asking the questions (or even knows what questions to ask) regarding the impact of farming practices beyond their bottom line? And if someone did ask those questions, would they have the ability to inject a sustainability value into that investment portfolio?

Farming is a business no doubt, but it is a business with a huge environmental footprint that extends well beyond the field borders. Farming practices are directly tied to human health and nutrition, water quality and biodiversity--things that should never be left in the hands of the bean counters and hedge fund managers. That's exactly what we seem to be doing.
 
 
Top