aircommuter
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2012
- Messages
- 503
- Location
- coulterville,ca
- Tractor
- case 570lxt, JCB 1550B, Gradall 534c, Hyster C612B,Ford 445A
To answer the water problem. The water is one of the most crooked operations in the state. First you have the LA basin, a group of developers and others who could profit from having more down there, formed an innocent sounding company that went up the Owens valley buying land that water sources then built canals to get it down there, then started draining creeks and lakes. This was years ago. I stayed in a hotel down there when taking my kids to Disneyland, the water came out of the shower so fast the the drain could not handle the volume. When I was finished getting pelted and shut off the shower the water was 4" over my ankles. The valve was a type that could be adjusted for temperature but not for flow.
The recent drought could have been managed by retaining more water in the reservoirs, instead it was let out as if the drought did not exist. They claimed they were required to keep the flow for the fish, but what would the fish do if the reservoir did not exist? They would only get the flow that was coming in, but they were getting 4-6 times that much, meanwhile they were rationing the homes and telling them they would soon be without water.
The water usage in this state is 50% enviromental, 40% agriculture ,and 10% housing and business, so it doesn't make sense to reduce the 10% number by 20% as that is only 2% but they could cut eviromental by 10% and the housing usage would matter.
Bottom line is that it is run crooks, money is being made, environmentalists are happy and the governor acts like he doing something.
The recent drought could have been managed by retaining more water in the reservoirs, instead it was let out as if the drought did not exist. They claimed they were required to keep the flow for the fish, but what would the fish do if the reservoir did not exist? They would only get the flow that was coming in, but they were getting 4-6 times that much, meanwhile they were rationing the homes and telling them they would soon be without water.
The water usage in this state is 50% enviromental, 40% agriculture ,and 10% housing and business, so it doesn't make sense to reduce the 10% number by 20% as that is only 2% but they could cut eviromental by 10% and the housing usage would matter.
Bottom line is that it is run crooks, money is being made, environmentalists are happy and the governor acts like he doing something.