EddieWalker
Epic Contributor
Kendall69 said:Obviously you still don't "get it"
Not sure who this was meant for, but since I'm in the trades, it's something that interests me.
I'm also one who "doesn't get it."
You have been very clear as to some of the advantages to hiring a lawyer and putting the responsibility of making the contractor do his job on the lawyers shoulders. What I does anybody need a lawyer for building a home or shop?
It's pretty simple and straight forward. You pay for work done, and if you're not happy with what's being done, you fire the contractor. If the contractor screws up really bad becuase of a lack of skill, knowledge or just plain laziness and it will cost time and money to undo, then yes, that's a good time to hire a lawyer.
A good example was the thread from "Tiles" about a contractor that they hired to pour a concrete foundation. The guy did a terrible job and after a year of fighting him, he redid it. I forget the details, but remember that some, if not all of that expense came out of his pocket.
There is no way that a lawyer could have predicted that, stoped or or made him do it right. All the documentation, contracts and legalise in the world is useless when you got a guy who's incompetent, lazy or dishonest.
This is the same in every trade, including the Law. Assuming that a guy is knowledgable about building homes because he's a lawyer isnt' going to get the building built any better, cheaper or faster.
I don't get it. What will the lawyer actually do? What will the contract he writes actually accomplish?
Eddie