Since I can dig down to 15 feet, is there any additional benefit from going from 6' down to maybe 12?
Also... if the recommended length is 600' of underground tubing, is there any benefit of putting in 1,000 or is it just a waste of money?
As an Example:
(repeat, this is only an example) For my area, with **K heat load and **K cooling load, the TS036 would need 625'' of trench at 6' deep in damp silt/clay soil. At 12' it would need 510' trench. this is for a horz 2 pipe spaced 24" apart.
If I use Knoxville TN bin data, at 12' it is 570' and at 6' it is 705' trench.
A slinky, 8 ft/ft, 3 ft coil at 12' would be 355' and at 6 ft would be 440' trench.
This is just an example to show how the depth can shorten the trench & pipe somewhat, and different pipe layouts make a difference.
More pipe is OK, as long as it is not drastically longer. you will need to have an antifreeze in the pipe, which slows the flow, so the longer the pipe the more pump you need. There comes a point the longer pipe does nothing but add to the cost, as it increases the pump size and causes more circulation pump electric usage. The main point is 1 loop per ton, the loops MUST be the same length, and use a reverse return header. One common mistake is to use the wrong soil conditions, and you can easily be 50% undersized, if your soil turns out to be drier etc...
Yearly heat cost, at $.10 per khw is estimated at $440, cooling $289, another $269 for hot water generations (I included desuperheater in the estimate). 12' deep saves only $18 /yr on the projected total cost.
Again, just an example using some made up heat and cooling numbers. you need the manual J calculation to determine these numbers.