swing mill vs. band mill

   / swing mill vs. band mill #1  

Groo

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
805
thinking about pivking up a sawmill.

anyone here have experience with both types?
 
   / swing mill vs. band mill #2  
your going to get a lot more responses over on

http://www.forestryforum.com/board/index.php/board,7.0.html

what type of trees do you plan on milling?

large trunks 24" and larger saw better on swingers because you can whittle them away as they sit on the ground not moving.

smaller logs 14" and under saw better on band mills.
 
   / swing mill vs. band mill #3  
I looked at this in some detail before buying a bandmill. Here is a brief summary of what I found:

Used bandmills are way cheaper. I found mine, a Lumbermate 2000, for under $5k. It's a completely manual mill, no hydraulics. I bought a bed extension, some adjustable feet and a few other extras and still got change for $6k. It can handle logs 24" dia and 18 feet long. It's manual, so milling is a work out.

The best swing blade mill I thought was the Peterson, a New Zealand made mill although the Lucas ran a close second. I saw a Peterson in action on a neighbouring island and was really impressed with it. Cost used was about triple what i paid for my bandmill, more than I was prepared to pay. I liked the fact that the swing blade mill could be set up really quick and only had 4 teeth to sharpen on the blade. Although I bought a bandmill sharpener and tooth setter, they're not automatic and I find that it's more cost effective to send the blades away for sharpening. I find the best new blades are Woodmizer, rather than Lumbermate and Woodmizer run a great delivery service.

With the swing blade mill, you set the mill over the log then mill away. With a bandmill, you have to move the logs to the mill and mount them on the log bed. This takes effort. I have three log piles on my property and find it easier to move the bandmill so its fairly close to the log pile I'm milling from at the time. Skidding logs takes work. If I could move the mill as easily as with a Peterson, it would save a good deal of sweat and the air would be a good deal less blue. Peterson have a pretty neat series of videos on their web site that shows their beast in operation. It makes interesting viewing.

Bandmills are good for planking. Set the log on the bed, then run the mill up and down, lowering the blade each pass to whatever thickness of plank you want. I milled all our paddock fencing this way, using Douglas Fir from the farm. Swing blade mills are great for cants (post and beam work). Turning large logs on the bandmill bed to make cants is a workout although it would be easier if I had a mill with hydraulics. Nonetheless, I milled a lot of post and beam work for the three buildings we erected.

All things considered, the mill was a great investment and I'm glad I took the time to learn how to mill. It's been a satisfying and rewarding process.
 
   / swing mill vs. band mill #4  
own a samll band mill and have no problem with 24" dia logs. Moving the logs isn't that bad if you use a little common sense. The swingblades seem nice but they also come with a price. Depending on your wallet and use, it will make a difference on what you decide.
 
   / swing mill vs. band mill #6  
With the swing blade mill, you set the mill over the log then mill away. With a bandmill, you have to move the logs to the mill and mount them on the log bed.

if you have a wack of logs to mill with a swinger, then it basicly goes the same way.

you set up the swing mill, lay out a set of sleepers and bring the logs to the mill. still have to move the logs just as much as with a band mill....
 
 
Top