|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Prudence Island, RI
Posts: 4,099
|
Quote:
Not sure exactly what a drainage swale is but it doesn't sound like something created by glacial action or movement of tectonic plates. Where do drainage swales fit on the "pucker factor" scale?![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 2,286
|
Some of those swales can get your attention. There is a distribution center west of town and they mow the sides of the overpass with a Steiner with duals on both axles. I have watched it and it still slides a little. The operator said it beat having to do it by hand.
David from jax
__________________
A serious accident is one that money won't fix. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Foothills of the Giant Sequoia's, California
Posts: 5,576
|
Speaking of drainage swales, I have little gullies that carry water in the rainy season. They are very little with hardly any bank on either side and not very deep. But I'll tell you what, when I'm mowing or working parallel to them, I really watch out. They may seem to be less than a foot deep, but if you get your tire in it, their is an overwhelming pucker factor feeling that you are going to tip over! Especially if the opposite tires go up on a small rock or mound. There is no margin of error where a meter will help at that time.
Point being that even a little "rut" like that can send you tipping over under the right conditions. They are the most benign looking but in reality can be the most dangerous since they are ignored or overlooked at times because they look so harmless. It's the ones you don't consider being dangerous that often are.
__________________
Rob- ...The Older I get...the Better I Used to be... |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Super Star Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Central florida
Posts: 18,681
|
Quote:
Even the bulldozer has to crawl straight up and down.. A ztr won't touch it.. it would be "mr frog's wild ride" for a ztr it is so steep.. So yeah... drainage swales can be anything from a shallow area on a side of a road to feed a culvert.. to a 'cliff' dropoff.. But you are correct.. florida has very little 'rolling' or sloped land that wasn't made that way by a piece of yellow machinery with a blade on it at one time or another .. etc.. (wink) Soundguy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 917
|
Quote:
Same here - back up the hill and drive back down. There are places that I might be able to safely traverse, however, still makes me nervous even backing up which keeps me thinking about safety - and those that depend on my safety.
__________________
As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another. (Proverbs 27:17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cedartown, Ga and N. Ga mountains
Posts: 2,909
|
Quote:
MarkV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Super Star Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Central florida
Posts: 18,681
|
I believe it would be more correct to say that using a tru drag mount mower ( not a semi-mount _ vs a 3pt removes the mower itself from the tip equation.. IE.. you don't hav ethe weight from the uphill side of the mower working on the tractor. Since many of the mounts/ hitches for the batwings have a decent drgree of flexibility.. I'm not sure they do much to 'couple' the tractor to the mower to prevent a roll.. though.. i guess they do 'some'.. just not enough to worry about. Still .. If I was mowing a 'questionable' slope.. i'd prefer it was a drag mower vs a 3pt.. which.. if it did get tippy.. IE a low side wheel went in a hole.. it wouldn't 'hike' that mower deck way high up in the air ont he high side.. which would be detrimental to the situation.
I mow virtually all flat land.. though have mowed a few drainage swales... for what i was doing.. both a fixed deck 10' and a batwiong felt fine.. then again.. the batwingfollows the contours WAY better than the fixed deck units.. etc.. so it is my preference in areas with anything but pancake land.. Soundguy |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central KY
Posts: 677
|
I've been thinking this same thing. This weekend I took the family to the Cincinnati Zoo and along I-75 the mowing crews were doing some of the death-defying things already mentioned here. Then last night was trying to spread out some piles of dirt left over from cleaning out a pond. There were several times I would have registered on that pucker scale, especially being an inexperienced tractor guy.
So, how far is too far? As Soundguy mentioned it totally depends on your set up, but the math is the same whatever you drive. For me, I did some quick estimates on my 6610. My tires are about 60" in diameter and with rims I estimate weigh 1,200 lbs each. The body of the tractor should be in the 6,000 range I think with a rough guess at center of gravity (COG) of about 40". So figuring out the moment of each wheel and the body, that gives an overall center of gravity of about 37". My newly narrowed wheel base is 84." With that, in a static condition, you can figure out how far is too far: The red dots are the approx COG of each wheel and the body. The green dot is approx COG for the whole thing. The compliment of the angle made between your COG, the edge of the wheel and your centerline is how far too far is... ![]() The answer for me should be 49°. However, two things come in to play. First is traction. In order to maintain traction the force of friction between the tires and the ground would have to overcome the component of gravity that would act on the tractor normal to the surface of contact. I seriously doubt I'd have that much traction unless the ground was soft and the tires could dig in. So in this case, hard ground would be better because you'd want it to slip rather than tilt. Many of you have seen this actually happen, the "dirt track" method of mowing. Second though is momentum, life on a tractor is not "static." This is the one that will reach up and bite you on the rump. When you are trucking along and hit a bump or a rut, the intertia of the tractor can easily cause it to flop over. Anything on the 3ph above the COG will only make this worse. It's good to see for me how that math works out, but I want a huge safety factor to keep a quick dip from sending me over. Play it safe.
__________________
"Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance." "No one but cattle know why they stampede... and they ain't talkin'." "It doesn't matter how big a ranch ya' own, or how many cows ya' brand, the size of your funeral is still gonna to depend on the weather." |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 377
|
Terrain will fool you. One minute you think you're okay and the next thing you've got a problem because the terrain you can't see under all the grass puts your machine in some odd position you didn't anticipate. Whatever the calculations might be on a flat surface, I don't know how anyone could really calculate the maximum slope for the effects of momentum, changing terrain, and a bushhog hanging off the back of the tractor. Then add the possibility of an operator goof (turning too sharply, whatever....) in the wrong place at the wrong time.
I wonder if the maximum slope is covered in anybody's owner's manual, and if it is, I wonder what assumptions were made for the calculation. I bet most of the manuals only say "AVOID STEEP SLOPES" for liability reasons. Not a lot of help for someone trying to figure out how far is too far with a particular tractor, but then how is the engineer supposed to know what size and weight bushhog is going to be used, etc. |
|
|
|
![]() |
||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| About TractorByNet.com | Terms of Service | Advertise | © 2008 TractorByNet.com |