|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Katrinaville LA west of Westwego east of Ama south of River Ridge north of Boutte, above sea level
Posts: 1,186
|
The state of Illinois now requires SMV emblems to meet the new ASAE S276.5 standard. Obviously, AgriSupply's signs do not meet this standard.
Last edited by tallyho8; 04-03-2008 at 11:30 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,832
|
Just idle curiosity on my part...Im not in the market for such a thing nor do I live in IL.
BTW thanx for the explanation...would have never though of that. How diff can the 'new' SMV be vs the 'old'?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Katrinaville LA west of Westwego east of Ama south of River Ridge north of Boutte, above sea level
Posts: 1,186
|
Actually, the new standard is ASAE S276.5 and you can not use the old standard ASAE S276.4 or ASAE S276.3 signs in Illinois. The new standard is supposed to be 10 times brighter than the old ones enabling slow moving equipment to be better seen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,752
|
Quote:
![]() Actually, I bet there is a grandfather clause on all currently used SMV's otherwise the AG lobby would have "raised cain"... ![]()
__________________
Paul in VT I used to own an ant farm but had to give it up. I couldn't find tractors small enough to fit it. -- Steven Wright |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Katrinaville LA west of Westwego east of Ama south of River Ridge north of Boutte, above sea level
Posts: 1,186
|
The ASAE S276.5 and ASAE S276.6 both are labeled at the bottom of the SMV sign. Old signs are not grandfathered in and must be replaced. The new signs are designed to be reflective twice as long and 10 times more than the old signs so they don't have to be replaced nearly as often. These signs are for YOUR safety so if you operate on roads I would recommend that you purchase the new signs even in states that do not require their use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,752
|
Quote:
NASD: Roadway Safety: Lighting and Marking of Agricultural Equipment
__________________
Paul in VT I used to own an ant farm but had to give it up. I couldn't find tractors small enough to fit it. -- Steven Wright |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,832
|
How interesting...I knew I asked in the right place.
Around here I dont think theres any particular req'ment for the SMV sign other than to have at least one somewhere on the implement/tractor. All I have seem to be the new type but I havent looked to see if theyre labeled w/ a version #. I know theyre REALLY bright when hit w/ lights at night. The reflection really lights things up! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Super Star Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Central florida
Posts: 18,174
|
Quote:
It's a nice gesture that they are changing all the rules for our safety.. however.. methinks this was a good gesture that snowballed into a deal that will cost the farmers money, make money for the sign sellers.. and in the end.. have a less than tangible effect of road safety due to the 'OTHER" drivers.. not the farm drivers.. etc. just my opinion... I see this kind of legislation all the time.. especially for guns.. etc.. soundguy |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| About TractorByNet.com | Terms of Service | Advertise | © 2008 TractorByNet.com |