patrickg
Veteran Member
In the Jul/Aug '01 issue of "Farm Journal" There is an article discussing the death of a 3 yr old boy who was killed while riding with his 5 yr old brother down a state highway in the bucket of a skid steer loader being operated by his father. The 3yr old bounced out and his head was driven over by the father. Due to an ongoing series of "child endangerments" in agricultural settings the district attourney was urged to bring charges against the father/operator. The father was charged with reckless endangerment and endangering the welfare of a child. The prosecuter said that the loss was a severe punishment and that he would recommend against jail time, instead he would move for safety training and community service.
There is a fine line but it seems that prosecution hinges on whether the parents knew or should have known their actions are dangerous. In this case the equipment had a warning sticker saying "No Riders". Accident or criminal negligence? If the warning sign were not there in plain sight then you would have to decide if the operator "knew" better or if the danger was unknown and therefore trully an accident. Letting a child talk on the phone shouldn't be criminalized when a child is killed by lightning via the phone I F there was no warning of an approaching storm or if it could be shown that the parent was truly ignorant of the risk.
Lucky for the father that I am not in a position to impose his sentence. I would parade him around the state with before and after pictures of his son. Cute kid with smile (before) gruesome gory bloody mess (after) and have him speak to various groups about child safety. I would include agricultural venues as well. Children are a SERIOUS responsibility. Young children can't look after themselves and willingly and joyfully go to their deaths because it looks like fun.
In this one county, Perry County in PA, in 18 months there were 3 farm related deaths of small children. Someone is not paying attention. Even if this is an anomaly, when multiplied across the country would be a tremendous loss of life of innocents unable to see to their own welfare. I don't have kids (but I was one once) and I'm incensed at this report.
Patrick
There is a fine line but it seems that prosecution hinges on whether the parents knew or should have known their actions are dangerous. In this case the equipment had a warning sticker saying "No Riders". Accident or criminal negligence? If the warning sign were not there in plain sight then you would have to decide if the operator "knew" better or if the danger was unknown and therefore trully an accident. Letting a child talk on the phone shouldn't be criminalized when a child is killed by lightning via the phone I F there was no warning of an approaching storm or if it could be shown that the parent was truly ignorant of the risk.
Lucky for the father that I am not in a position to impose his sentence. I would parade him around the state with before and after pictures of his son. Cute kid with smile (before) gruesome gory bloody mess (after) and have him speak to various groups about child safety. I would include agricultural venues as well. Children are a SERIOUS responsibility. Young children can't look after themselves and willingly and joyfully go to their deaths because it looks like fun.
In this one county, Perry County in PA, in 18 months there were 3 farm related deaths of small children. Someone is not paying attention. Even if this is an anomaly, when multiplied across the country would be a tremendous loss of life of innocents unable to see to their own welfare. I don't have kids (but I was one once) and I'm incensed at this report.
Patrick