Feds to require CDL for farm tractors

   / Feds to require CDL for farm tractors #41  
Thank for posting CURRENT laws regarding operation of farm equipment on public roadways. Now....go read the PROPOSED laws that have been taken down....You'll find them in my link.

One of my departed grandfather's favorite sayings; "None are so blind as those who will not see."

Some argue for nothing more than argument's sake.
 
   / Feds to require CDL for farm tractors #43  
That was from your link. :rolleyes:

Yes, CURRENT laws as they are NOW.....

Try reading (or have someone else read it for you) the link FROM DOT.....I hope you find clarity in the confusion you're apparently bogged down in.

So you're staying with the "I'm right and the whole world is wrong" opinion of yourself? That speaks volumes
 
   / Feds to require CDL for farm tractors #44  
Yes, CURRENT laws as they are NOW.....

Nope. That is not in the current interpretations.

From your link.

SUMMARY: FMCSA requests public comment on:...... (3) proposed guidance to determine whether off-road farm equipment or implements of husbandry operated on public roads for limited distances are considered commercial motor vehicles. The guidance would be used to help ensure uniform application of the safety regulations by enforcement personnel, motor carriers and commercial motor vehicle drivers.

This is hilarious that you claim it is there but won't/can't point it out.
 
   / Feds to require CDL for farm tractors #45  
this law like all laws was written by lawyers in congress so we know a few things about it with out reading.
1 it does not address any real problem
2 it only affects people that don't need it or want it
3 it does not affect any large campaign contributor
4 it will cost twice what any revenues it generates
5 the person that wrote it does not have any idea what a tractor or combine is
6 congress is exempt
 
   / Feds to require CDL for farm tractors #46  
This is hilarious that you claim it is there but won't/can't point it out.


What is REALLY REALLY hilarious is you obviously don't know when you're wrong, but continue to post when EVERYONE else CLEARLY understands the facts. Funny how DOT spokesperson made public announcment as to their dropping planned CDL requirements on farm tractors, combines, ect.....You might wanna go make your (failed) case with them Sparky. You're just embarrasing yourself here.


http://www.jontester.com/news/2011/independent-record-cdl-requirement-for-farmers-dropped/


and this one....



http://helenair.com/news/cdl-requir...cle_f79a1930-c3e2-11e0-b807-001cc4c03286.html


So....It's YOUR contention that the DOT made a public announcement that they were dropping a proposal that they never proposed in the first place...? Even though they're on public record in multitudes of media sources. Really...Are you a Senator or Congressman? They also talk in circles, omitting facts and reality.
 
Last edited:
   / Feds to require CDL for farm tractors #47  
What is REALLY REALLY hilarious is you obviously don't know when you're wrong, but continue to post when EVERYONE else CLEARLY understands the facts. Funny how DOT spokesperson made public announcment as to their dropping planned CDL requirements on farm tractors, combines, ect.....You might wanna go make your (failed) case with them Sparky. You're just embarrasing yourself here.


Independent Record: CDL requirement for farmers dropped | Jon Tester, U.S. Senator for Montana


and this one....



CDL requirement for farmers dropped


So....It's YOUR contention that the DOT made a public announcement that they were dropping a proposal that they never proposed in the first place...? Even though they're on public record in multitudes of media sources. Really...Are you a Senator or Congressman? They also talk in circles, omitting facts and reality.
Farmwithjunk,
You are wasting your breathe, and your fingertips...............
I realized that several months back when I tried to interject reality
into a thread about how as a landlord..............I would need to raise the rent, if my taxes were raised.
He doesn't, and cannot understand business, taxes, 'man-made global warming':laughing:, or anything else that pertains to the real world.
I totally quit responding to him due to his apparent lack of knowledge.
 
   / Feds to require CDL for farm tractors #48  
"The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, which is a part of DOT, wants to adopt standards that would reclassify all farm vehicles and implements as Commercial Motor Vehicles, officials said. Likewise, the proposal, if adopted, would require all farmers and everyone on the farm who operates any of the equipment to obtain a CDL, they added.
The proposed rule change would mean that anyone who drives a tractor or operates any piece of motorized farming equipment would be required to pass the same tests and complete the same detailed forms and logs required of semi-tractor trailer drivers..."


Hmmm......


From that blurb, from the piece FWJ posted the original link to, it would certainly sound as if the proposed changes would directly affect the operation of farm/heavy equipment.

Idiocy. When, as we now so often find ourselves, the "public servants" we are working with have no idea how the real world operates and only understand how the bureaucratic system operates........we have this. Heavy equipment is big, heavy, and burns diesel so therefore it's just like semi-trucks to the bureaucratic mind. Since heavy road trucks need licensing and records and such, then, so should heavy off-road vehicles. They're both loud and blow billowing clouds of dark smoke after all. It makes perfect bureaucratic sense to them since they have no idea of the real world applications and implications of such a decision. Ya see.

One more symptom of the lingering, growing, and deadly cancer our nation has in its heart in the District of Corruption. Not to be "political" in a, well, thread about government and politics..........but there are voting habits that lead to such types of proposals. There are others which lead to diametrically opposed types of proposals.


You figure it out. It's really very clear and simple.
 
   / Feds to require CDL for farm tractors #49  
JoeinTX;2474818 Not to be "political" in a said:
There are others which lead to diametrically opposed types of proposals.[/B]


You figure it out. It's really very clear and simple.
Now if we could only get the "non-thinkers" to realize the folly of their ways.

Because the "non-thinkers" IE: followers........the ones that "stand for nothing, but will fall for anything.............seem to be the majority.
 
   / Feds to require CDL for farm tractors #50  
Sorry for posting in the wrong place. I started this thread this morning in the Rural Living section on this subject. It is an article that is in the last issue of Texas Farm Bureau's publication. As I read it, no one can drive any motorized farm equipment on a farm without a CDL. This includes kids in a farm family until they turn 18. This would ruin family farms that depend on the kids helping get the crop to market. You can see the article here.....New regulations could threaten farm transportation - TractorByNet.com

hugs, Brandi
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2007 Chevrolet Impala Sedan (A51694)
2007 Chevrolet...
2015 DODGE RAM 1500 CREW CAB TRUCK (A51406)
2015 DODGE RAM...
2013 PETERBILT 365 T/A DUMP TRUCK (A51406)
2013 PETERBILT 365...
1261 (A50490)
1261 (A50490)
2005 Caterpillar 430D 4x4 Extendahoe Backhoe Loader (A51691)
2005 Caterpillar...
UNUSED FUTURE FT380 STAND ON SKID STEER (A51247)
UNUSED FUTURE...
 
Top