I've been looking at JD 300/400 series and also some of the compact tractors new & used.
My *feeling* is that the Garden tractors (based on what I see used) discount as though they have a 2000 to 2400 hour lifespan. A JD3xx w/ 1200 hours might sell for half. Some older model JD GTs 318, 275 w/ ~2000 hours are priced at only 10-15% of new (and are often on a second engine, drive, even tranny). Maybe this is because the models are too old for part & attachment availability.
The compacts (both JD & Kubota) discount in much longer time. Also used attachments are more available.
Can someone confirm/deny this ? Is the more quickly declining prices of the GTs due to model changes and unavailability of part & attachments or is it due to the a shorter useful lifespan(hour count)of the unit ?
My continuing needs could probably be met with a 300 series, mower, tiller & blade, but I do have a few projects that would call for bigger equipment on a sporadic basis (I could hire that out).
I'm starting to believe I'd be ahead with a used compact tractor. I suspect I could buy one used and resell it - even 10-15 yeaqrs later - for about what I paid . That's certainly not true for a GT. What sort of finish mowing performance will I get with a belly mower on a compact vs a 54" deck on a GT ? I expect that I would be gaining a lot in terms of flexibility (3pt, pto, bigger tranny) with a compact - what am I losing besides turning radius ?
I know I'm calling for a gross generalization here - but what sort of serious repair should I expect from a compact over time vs a GT ? What sort of life can I get from tires ?
Not to start a religious war, but is JD the way to go for used compact tractors ? I read here that replacement parts are sky-high.
I see quite a few compacts for sale at about 15 years of age with only about 1200-1500 hours on them. This seems too low to have seen commercial use. Why is this ?
My *feeling* is that the Garden tractors (based on what I see used) discount as though they have a 2000 to 2400 hour lifespan. A JD3xx w/ 1200 hours might sell for half. Some older model JD GTs 318, 275 w/ ~2000 hours are priced at only 10-15% of new (and are often on a second engine, drive, even tranny). Maybe this is because the models are too old for part & attachment availability.
The compacts (both JD & Kubota) discount in much longer time. Also used attachments are more available.
Can someone confirm/deny this ? Is the more quickly declining prices of the GTs due to model changes and unavailability of part & attachments or is it due to the a shorter useful lifespan(hour count)of the unit ?
My continuing needs could probably be met with a 300 series, mower, tiller & blade, but I do have a few projects that would call for bigger equipment on a sporadic basis (I could hire that out).
I'm starting to believe I'd be ahead with a used compact tractor. I suspect I could buy one used and resell it - even 10-15 yeaqrs later - for about what I paid . That's certainly not true for a GT. What sort of finish mowing performance will I get with a belly mower on a compact vs a 54" deck on a GT ? I expect that I would be gaining a lot in terms of flexibility (3pt, pto, bigger tranny) with a compact - what am I losing besides turning radius ?
I know I'm calling for a gross generalization here - but what sort of serious repair should I expect from a compact over time vs a GT ? What sort of life can I get from tires ?
Not to start a religious war, but is JD the way to go for used compact tractors ? I read here that replacement parts are sky-high.
I see quite a few compacts for sale at about 15 years of age with only about 1200-1500 hours on them. This seems too low to have seen commercial use. Why is this ?