I should mention the head to head test I mentioned comes from all our favorite: Consumer Reports. The other test I have seen is on Pickup Truck.com. It has the gasoline v. diesel testing (minus the Tundra). I should note that my 2008 250 has a 13,000 pound towing capacity, as does my friend's GMC--both though with the caveat of a "weight distributing hitch!!" The Tundra, which looks miniscle in size next to my truck, has a 10,800 pound towing capacity, but makes no mention of weight distributing hitch requirements. In looking at the hitch on that truck in person, it does not seem to be as heavy as the one on either the GMC or the Ford, but it still is--I think--considered a class V hitch. One question I have not heard about yet is how these gassers are performing so well, even though on paper, they should be getting blown away. I do not understand this fact. Using a simplistic example, I traded a gas XUV Gator for the same thing in diesel. They are rated as only 1.6 hp and 3 lb.ft. torque different yet the diesel feels as though it has twice the power. It runs circles around the older gas one I had. It seems as though an equivalent powered diesel would run circles around any gas engine, yet even with much more torque both peak and usable, the diesels have a difficult time dispatching of the gas engines. One poster mentioned about hills. In the PickupTruck.com article they did hills, and the gas V10 Ford was really (uncomfortably) close to the diesels in performance there also. Go figure.
JohnM
JohnM