HOME  DISCUSSIONS  PHOTOS  REVIEWS  CLASSIFIEDS  DEALERS  STORE
 

Go Back   TractorByNet.com > General Forums > Trailers & Transportation
Show Recent Threads:
24 Hours
Since My Last Visit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-26-2008, 06:52 PM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 37
Default Re: Trailer coupler rating

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reg
The coupler's rating is about the towed load - NOT as you seem to have concluded, about what it can take suspended from or loaded directly onto it.

If you go through the whole trailer you will find similar mismatches in other places, e.g. the tires COULD take more or less load than the axles, typically more. You are limited by the lowest rated component - in it's role, not a fantasy role of hanging the trailer from it.
I believe what I am trying to find out is not a fantasy rating of the trailer components abilities under extreme instances but rather if the manufacturers are correct in putting lower rated components ( specifically the 5000lbs rated coupler) on a trailer rated for thousands of pounds more overall.
What would be the difference between the "towed load" and the "load directly placed onto the trailer"??
By your point of being limited to the lowest rated component ( which I happen to agree with) than it would be the wrong coupler for a 7000 GVW trailer? There seems to be a huge disparity in opinions here but I would rather err on the side of caution or am I reading your message wrong?
Thanks again for the input, Scott
furnacebrook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 08:22 PM   #12 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
kenmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 2,529
Default Re: Trailer coupler rating

Not all . But, most places only sell 2" 5000# rated balls. I had to look around to find a ball rated for more than 5000#
kenmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 08:42 PM   #13 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NH seacoast & Coos County
Posts: 846
Default Re: Trailer coupler rating

Quote:
Originally Posted by furnacebrook
I believe what I am trying to find out is not a fantasy rating of the trailer components abilities under extreme instances but rather if the manufacturers are correct in putting lower rated components ( specifically the 5000lbs rated coupler) on a trailer rated for thousands of pounds more overall.
What would be the difference between the "towed load" and the "load directly placed onto the trailer"??
By your point of being limited to the lowest rated component ( which I happen to agree with) than it would be the wrong coupler for a 7000 GVW trailer? There seems to be a huge disparity in opinions here but I would rather err on the side of caution or am I reading your message wrong?
Thanks again for the input, Scott
As much as the litigious society we live in is touted on TBN do you think it's likely that ALL trailer manufacturers use the same components in their trailers, purposely overrate their capacity, and remain in business for decades?

If you've ever moved something like a boat on a trailer by hand you can visualize the difference between towed & actual load. If the boat weighed 1500 lbs you could neither lift it nor drag it directly across the ground. When on a trailer the leverage of the tongue length makes it possible to lift the front of the trailer, a portion of the boat's weight. The bearings & wheels carry most of the boats weight and overcome the friction of dragging the boat. The hitch sees the resultant weight, not the actual weight. Even in severe braking most of the boats weight is carried by the wheels. If you run into a wall the hitch will see the full weight of the boat plus the force generated by its velocity. Then the hitch will probably fail.

Over the road log trailers in NH can be registered for 50 ton. You won't find them fitted with tires rated for 12500 lbs because the tractor carries much of the load. I looked at a new 20T tagalong trailer last night. The load capacity of the tires is just under 16T. The designed rating is based on the assembly, not the weakest part. A failure of the weakest part usually comes from exceeding the design rating thru extraordinary circumstance, like hitting the wall. MikeD74T
MikeD74T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 03:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
wushaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bristol Texas
Posts: 2,595
Default Re: Trailer coupler rating

Quote:
Originally Posted by skipmarcy
I had a 2" Bulldog coupler rated for 10k and 2" ball & mount rated for 10k, you just have to look elsewhere than Walmart for them.
I've seen 8k 2" ball, I have one but a 10k 2", I have not seen or heard of this animal.
Got a link of who has this?
__________________
Kubota L2800HST, Mitsubishi 372, bh75, 45" Agric tiller, 5' home made disk, 42" Bush hog, PHD, 66" Cammond BB.
wushaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 06:06 PM   #15 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Erin, Tenn.
Posts: 340
Default Re: Trailer coupler rating

Sorry, I don't know where to get the 10k 2" ball online. I bought mine from a trailer supply outfit in Ft. Pierce, Fl., along with the 6" gusseted drop mount I used on my F250 to pull my tractor. The ball had the same diameter shank as my 2 5/16" ball, I think it was 1 1/4" shank. They both were stamped for 10k rating. My Hurst 20' equip. trailer had a cast Bulldog type coupler with 10k rating stamped into it, not sure if it was the Bulldog brand. I just sold my F250 and 2 heavy trailers about a month ago so I don't have them here anymore. That Hurst trailer was a 14k trailer by the way, with that 10k rated coupler. I wondered about it for awhile but in the 7 years I had it I'd hauled my tractors around thousands & thousands of miles on all kinds of roads and fields.
__________________
Mahindra 4110, FEL w/5' & 6' QA buckets & forks, 6' Atlas boxblade, 6' Howse rotary, Leinbach PHD w/9" & 12", 1 bottom plow, MF 2/3 bottom plow, 20"x6' bog disc,TSC subsoiler, TSC middlebuster, 6 ton Anderson 12' dump trailer, 20' Hurst 14k flat trailer.
skipmarcy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 08:24 PM   #16 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
wushaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bristol Texas
Posts: 2,595
Default Re: Trailer coupler rating

Yea that 8k I have is also 1 1/4" shank.

Interesting on what makes one 8k and the other 10k with same shank size and that 10k probably had a tapered shank from the ball to the base also.
__________________
Kubota L2800HST, Mitsubishi 372, bh75, 45" Agric tiller, 5' home made disk, 42" Bush hog, PHD, 66" Cammond BB.
wushaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2008, 10:24 AM   #17 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
amigauser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Unionville, Connecticut USA
Posts: 379
Default Re: Trailer coupler rating

Here is a 2 inch ball rated for up to 12,000. I am sure there are other sources online to.

Curt Hitchball with 2 inch Ball Diameter-Optional Shank Diameters - Hitch Balls at Trailer Hitches
__________________
Kubota B3030HSDCC, LA403 FEL, Kubota Quick Hitch and 6 Foot Front Blade, ATI Tooth Bar, ATI Tach-All, WR Long 3rd Function Kit, WR Long RBG2 48" grapple, Bradco Pallet Forks, JD 3pt Ballast Box, etc.
amigauser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 11:29 PM   #18 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Kendrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vermont
Posts: 302
Default Re: Trailer coupler rating

there are 2 points to this. 1 is how the trailer is designed to distribute weight when properly loaded. the balancing act between weight down on the hitch vs the weight on the wheels.
2 is, what constitues resonable risk. how much must a trailer manufacturer overbuild a trailer to be reasonably safe from litigation when some one misuses a trailer and it fails. the trailers have to be built to handle some over exertions due to user error. ie 40/60 so that the toungue is lifting the tail of the truck due to load shift during use. handeling a left side heavy trailer because some one has 1 full tank and 1 empty tank on the trailer with 2000lbs of liquid in the tank. the users tendancy's to not follow the weight or load specifications are part of the "proper" build process for a good trailer or any tool for that matter.

users view of the product also falls in to play as well. some one mentioned the in writing issue and how the manufacturer just replaced all the fronts in town. it is easier for them to not have to answer those questions then to find out. it also is better to make a product the user doesnt question right off the bat.
__________________
DK45 CAB kioti 72" RFM, sundown 72" BB, kioti BH, RAD B74 Snowblower, NH 478, 495 Mower & Conditioner, NH 271 Bailer, Oliver 565 plow, decreped gehl cart
Kendrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM.


HOME DISCUSSIONS PHOTOS REVIEWS CLASSIFIEDS DEALERS STORE
About TractorByNet.com | Terms of Service | Advertise | © 2008 TractorByNet.com