Go Back   TractorByNet.com > General Forums > Trailers & Transportation
Show Recent Threads:
24 Hours
Since My Last Visit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2009, 10:38 PM   #41 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
Builder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 750 mi. east of a &@$!*#!%
Posts: 4,409
Default Re: Good job of chaining down your tractor?

lol,

I thought he meant the trailer hitch should be turned over so that it is closer to the ground!

Don't think that would makes the problems go away! lol
__________________
'07 Kubota M-7040 4x4 tractor: 70HP, Hyd-reverser, 4in1 q/a FEL w/ aux. hyd, Cab-AC, 2 remotes, R-1's, rim gaurd.
'00 New Holland LB115 4x4 Backhoe: 108HP, Powershift. Cab-AC, 4WD/4WS, posi front/rear axles, 4in1 FEL, X-hoe, Aux hammer hydraulics.
'05 Challenger MT285B 4x4 CUT: 48HP HST, Cab-AC, 4in1 q/a FEL w/ aux hyd, 2 remotes, R-4's.
'07 GMC 3500 4x4 Crewcab SLT: Dmax/Ally, utility body.
'92 IH 4800 4x4 Dumptruck: DTA-466 250HP high torque, airbrakes, 7-spd, 12' dump, 33K/56K GCWR.
Builder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 10:50 PM   #42 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
KB9UDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tower Hill, IL USA
Posts: 383
Default Re: Good job of chaining down your tractor?

That rig would have never made it through central IL recently. We had state police and DOT stopping every truck and trailer around looking them over. A good friend of mine was fined big time because he had a bobcat on his trailer only tied down with 2 chains and binders.
__________________
John Deere 4120 Power Reverser, 400x Loader

John Deere 2320, 200cx Loader


Acts 2:38
KB9UDE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 11:37 PM   #43 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amanda, OH
Posts: 575
Default Re: Good job of chaining down your tractor?

You guys missed the whole jissed of this thread. Its all right....nothings wrong here.....a Ford is pulling that trailer! Hehehehehe.
wkpoor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2009, 02:06 AM   #44 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
mjncad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Front Range of Colorado
Posts: 2,166
Default Re: Good job of chaining down your tractor?

Are you sure the plates weren't from outside the USA?
__________________
Measure it with a micrometer, mark it with chalk, cut it with a torch, beat to fit, paint to match, inspect it with a microscope.

Google finally fixed Picasa web albums problems I was having. Latest postings.

http://picasaweb.google.com/mjncad/HydraulicsUpgrades#

http://picasaweb.google.com/mjncad/ToolsPower#
mjncad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2009, 08:15 AM   #45 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
Diamondpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Daleville, IN
Posts: 4,681
Default Re: Good job of chaining down your tractor?

[quote=wkpoor;1745212]
Quote:
[A bigger issue is the way he has his ball mount flipped./QUOTE]
I fail to see what the problem is there. I have to do that on my trailer (5" up) and I'm normally over 1000lb tongue load.
BTW from your first post DP I realized you do actually fly a Diamond. I work for a large corpoated flight department as a mechanic.
I used to fly a Diamond along with Beech Jets, Citations, and now a Sabre 65. I have also flown many Turbo Props such as PC12's, Caravan's, King Airs, Cheyenne's, and MU2's. I just keep the name even though its been nearly 10 years since I steeped food in the Diamond.

Chris
Diamondpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2009, 08:17 AM   #46 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
Diamondpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Daleville, IN
Posts: 4,681
Default Re: Good job of chaining down your tractor?

[quote=Builder;1745232]
Quote:
Originally Posted by wkpoor View Post

X2.

If the ball was the other way, the trailer tongue would be practically scraping the pavement with the rear of the F-150 is sagging.
That truck is a 2 wheel drive and was not sagging one bit. It is setting level. Switching the ball mount around would not make the truck sag but moving the tractor forward on the trailer would do so. Remember we are talking about a Ford here, not a Cheby!

Chris

Last edited by MikePA; 08-29-2009 at 09:43 AM. Reason: Removed personal slam.
Diamondpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2009, 08:19 AM   #47 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
Diamondpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Daleville, IN
Posts: 4,681
Default Re: Good job of chaining down your tractor?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffster View Post
Turning the ball over would help to level the trailer and reduce the chance of overloading the rear axle.
Finally, someone who has seen the light. Flipping the hitch over would fix many problems here. Now he just needs some chains and binders and he will be all set.

Chris
Diamondpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2009, 09:20 AM   #48 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
Builder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 750 mi. east of a &@$!*#!%
Posts: 4,409
Default Re: Good job of chaining down your tractor?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamondpilot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Builder View Post

That truck is a 2 wheel drive and was not sagging one bit. It is setting level. Switching the ball mount around would not make the truck sag but moving the tractor forward on the trailer would do so. Remember we are talking about a Ford here, not a Cheby!

Chris
I never said flipping the ball would make the truck sag more. I said if it were flipped, it would be too close to the ground.

The way the rear end is sagging, if the hitch were flipped, the hitch would be too close to the ground resulting in a dangerous condition. I'm sure the safety chains, trailer wirining harness and brake cable would be scraping the ground all the way along the trip, too.

As far as your "cheby" comment, you should remind yourself that these are pictures of a ford with a sagging rear end and hardly any tongue weight on it either. Poking fun at other brands is like yelling in an empty forest since it's your beloved ford that has the sagging problem with very little tongue weight, not chevy or dodge.
__________________
'07 Kubota M-7040 4x4 tractor: 70HP, Hyd-reverser, 4in1 q/a FEL w/ aux. hyd, Cab-AC, 2 remotes, R-1's, rim gaurd.
'00 New Holland LB115 4x4 Backhoe: 108HP, Powershift. Cab-AC, 4WD/4WS, posi front/rear axles, 4in1 FEL, X-hoe, Aux hammer hydraulics.
'05 Challenger MT285B 4x4 CUT: 48HP HST, Cab-AC, 4in1 q/a FEL w/ aux hyd, 2 remotes, R-4's.
'07 GMC 3500 4x4 Crewcab SLT: Dmax/Ally, utility body.
'92 IH 4800 4x4 Dumptruck: DTA-466 250HP high torque, airbrakes, 7-spd, 12' dump, 33K/56K GCWR.
Builder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2009, 09:29 AM   #49 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Duffster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,683
Default Re: Good job of chaining down your tractor?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Builder View Post

I never said flipping the ball would make the truck sag more. I said if it were flipped, it would be too close to the ground.

The way the rear end is sagging, if the hitch were flipped, the hitch would be too close to the ground resulting in a dangerous condition. I'm sure the safety chains, trailer wirining harness and brake cable would be scraping the ground all the way along the trip, too.

As far as your "cheby" comment, you should remind yourself that these are pictures of a ford with a sagging rear end and hardly any tongue weight on it either. Poking fun at other brands is like yelling in an empty forest since it's your beloved ford that has the sagging problem with very little tongue weight, not chevy or dodge.
Why are you quoting yourself?

Your the one that commented on the rear axle being overloaded, yet you don't understand why the ball hitch needs to be turned over.

If you look at the pictures it would clearly NOT be to close to the ground if done properly.
__________________
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking." George Patton

Last edited by Duffster; 08-29-2009 at 09:56 AM. Reason: Spelling
Duffster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2009, 09:43 AM   #50 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
Builder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 750 mi. east of a &@$!*#!%
Posts: 4,409
Default Re: Good job of chaining down your tractor?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffster View Post
Why are you quoting yourself?

Your the one that commented on the rear axle being overloaded, yet you don't understand why the ball hitch needs to be turned over.

If you look at the pictures it would clearly NOT be to close to the ground of done properly.
Please don't change the subject as the thread continues. Here's the subject I am talking about: Flipping the hitch-nothing else, not repositioning the tractor, adding safety chains, etc.. The hitch has about a 5" drop to it. As you can see the hitch is flipped into the up position, creating more clearance for the hitch. Flipping it down, with the trucks excessive sagging condition would make the hitch too close to the ground. Whether it helps level the trailer won't overcome the drastic change in the hitch position.

"If done properly" is your way of changing the subject. Sure if a lot of things were changed (done properly) that set up could be made safe, but simply turning the hitch over only makes the hitch too close to the pavement for safety.
__________________
'07 Kubota M-7040 4x4 tractor: 70HP, Hyd-reverser, 4in1 q/a FEL w/ aux. hyd, Cab-AC, 2 remotes, R-1's, rim gaurd.
'00 New Holland LB115 4x4 Backhoe: 108HP, Powershift. Cab-AC, 4WD/4WS, posi front/rear axles, 4in1 FEL, X-hoe, Aux hammer hydraulics.
'05 Challenger MT285B 4x4 CUT: 48HP HST, Cab-AC, 4in1 q/a FEL w/ aux hyd, 2 remotes, R-4's.
'07 GMC 3500 4x4 Crewcab SLT: Dmax/Ally, utility body.
'92 IH 4800 4x4 Dumptruck: DTA-466 250HP high torque, airbrakes, 7-spd, 12' dump, 33K/56K GCWR.
Builder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Page generated in 0.07638 seconds with 9 queries