The reality of aluminum body panels.

Status
Not open for further replies.
   / The reality of aluminum body panels. #1  

roadhunter

Elite Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Messages
2,633
Location
Wyoming
Tractor
JCB 212SU
Now we have actual confirmation of what common sense told us all along.

What's Crazier Than Smashing An Aluminum Ford F-150 With A Sledgehammer? The Repair Bill - Forbes


What's Crazier Than Smashing An Aluminum Ford F-150 With A Sledgehammer? The Repair Bill


Comment Now Follow Comments









Ever since Ford Motor F -0.99% launched the industry痴 first aluminum-bodied pickup truck, skeptics have wondered what it would cost to repair damage to the F-150′s 杜ilitary grade aluminum panels after a crash.

Now, thanks to a clever stunt by the folks at Edmunds.com, we have a good idea. And it痴 not pretty.

Editors at the consumer advice website bought a $52,000 F-150 4X4 Super Crew for their long-term test fleet, then promptly took a sledgehammer to the rear quarter panel twice intentionally denting it so they could investigate the repair costs. (My first thought was, 釘rilliant! Why didn稚 I think of that?!?

Edmunds goal, in the name of consumer awareness, was to test the theory that it痴 more expensive to repair an aluminum truck than a steel one. Their answer? Way, way more. (There are a few flaws in their approach, however, which we値l get to later.)

Here痴 what Edmunds found: It wasn稚 just the two fist-sized dents behind the rear wheel that needed repairing. The energy from the blows also left at least four creases in the aluminum panel. And, it turns out, that energy was enough to crack the rear tail light as well, which drove up the repair costs (way more, in fact, than you might imagine).

Even so, Edmunds Editor-in-Chief Scott Oldham says his team was surprised at how strong the F-150 was. 展e were impressed with the resilience of the aluminum panel. We hit it and thought it would have far more damage than it did. So we hit it again. That was eye opening.

Still, the real purpose of the stunt was to see how expensive it would be for major collision work. Ford helpfully pointed out that the price for a replacement right rear-quarter panel is exactly the same on a steel-bodied 2014 F-150 as it is on the aluminum-bodied 2015 model: $967.48. But Edmunds deliberately chose to smash the rear quarter panel because it痴 a body part that is less likely to be swapped out like a damaged door, hood or front fender. Instead, it needed meticulous body work.




The problem is that the work has to be done in a segregated clean room away from other metal particles that could cause contamination or paint adhesion problems by trained experts in 殿luminum-capable body shops or dealerships using special tools. This isn稚 that rare; after all, lots of cars have aluminum body panels so there are plenty of experts around. But the equipment is expensive. Ford pegs the cost at $30,000-$50,000 for a single service bay. Some dealers gripe they致e spent closer to $70,000, which could take years to pay off.

The other issue, according to Edmunds, is that the dealer and an independent body shop told them the labor rate for aluminum repairs can be up to $120 an hour twice the rate for traditional collision work and aluminum is more difficult to work with, so the job takes longer.

When all was said and done, the bill to fix the bludgeoned pickup was $2,938.44, which included more than 20 hours of labor to straighten the panel, apply a specialized aluminum paint filler, then prime, paint, color sand and buff the panel. That was a discount, actually, because the Ford service technician took pity on the brand new truck owner (never identified as Edmunds to protect the integrity of the experiment) and charged him the regular $60-per-hour labor rate, instead of the $120-per-hour aluminum labor rate. If the dealer had charged the full $120 rate, Edmunds figures the bill would have come to $4,138.44 $1,800, or nearly 77 percent, more than the cost of repairing a steel panel for a typical 10 hours at $60 per hour.




Here痴 the flaw in Edmunds findings. They never took a sledgehammer to a 2014 F-150 to find out what it would cost to repair similar damage to a steel body panel. I壇 like to take a look at that repair bill. Ford says the cost of pulling a dent from an aluminum body panel should take no longer than a steel one. Ford spokesman Mike Levine also says that in many cases the new F-150 will actually be easier to repair, because of its innovative modular structure which reduces repair time and helps save costs. Major body damage like the type Edmunds inflicted on the 2015 F-150 is rare only about 1 percent of repair work, according to Ford. The majority of F-150 collision repairs will be non-structural and can be completed by most body shops today (e.g. bumpers, grilles, mirrors, dings, dents).

In fact, Ford offers up a fun video of its own, showing professional athletes whacking golf balls, baseballs and even a shot put into the reinforced truck bed to demonstrate that the aluminum F-150 is actually about 30 percent more ding- and dent-resistant than the outgoing steel model.

What痴 clear is none of this is cheap. Remember the broken taillight? That turned into a big ticket item, too: Not only was the broken lens integrated into a single assembly that needed replacement, all of the sensors for the truck痴 blind-spot monitoring system are housed in the same unit. Crack a lens and you have to replace the whole taillight for a whopping $887.75. Of course, that would be true on any vehicle equipped with such high-end safety technology. But even replacing the damaged 鉄port 4X4″ decal cost $64.

What痴 still unknown is the impact of such repair costs on insurance rates, which could drive up the truck痴 total cost of ownership, despite the gas savings F-150 owners can expect from a lighter truck. So far, most insurers aren稚 charging more, but loss experience over time will determine the true cost of collision insurance.




So what conclusions can be drawn from Edmunds little stunt? Here痴 what Associate Editor Travis Langness wrote: 典here痴 plenty to speculate about when it comes to the new 2015 Ford F-150, and we致e got a year to keep testing out our theories, but there are a few things we know for sure. One: It takes more time, unique tools and specialized training to fix aluminum body panels. Two: Those repairs, whether through higher labor rates or longer service times, cost more money than repairing steel. And three: It痴 really fun to smash things with a sledgehammer.納/U]

More of Edmunds three-part video diary of its sledgehammer adventure can be found here.
 
   / The reality of aluminum body panels. #2  
That's a lot of cheddar for a pickup truck. Why not carbon fiber?
 
   / The reality of aluminum body panels. #3  
The article mentions the flaw is that we have no "control" -- ie, no comparison for the cost of repairing a steel truck with the same exact damage. So I don't see how any conclusions can be reached. If the repair was done as mentioned, which included pulling the dents and using body filler, that is not any different than a repair made on a steel panel with similar damage. That is a labor-intensive repair, somewhat independent of the material. It wouldn't even require/justify special treatment that some aluminum work does.

Aluminum body parts have been on a lot of cars for years, including fenders, roofs, and hoods. I have owned several, including one that we had a deer run into while going 35mph, requiring a new front fender and hood repair (the hood was aluminum). Never saw any indication that the repair was more expensive or more special than if we had a steel hood. Insurance company and body shop shared all the numbers with us. This was an old body shop that has been around for decades, and trust me they did not have a special aluminum guy or special aluminum area.
 
   / The reality of aluminum body panels. #4  
"Even so, Edmunds Editor-in-Chief Scott Oldham says his team was surprised at how strong the F-150 was. “We were impressed with the resilience of the aluminum panel. We hit it and thought it would have far more damage than it did. So we hit it again. That was eye opening.”

So, if they did this to a steel truck would it have had much more damage to repair?
Also, Edmunds "estimated" someone could have repaired a steel truck in half the time, and at half the hourly rate. Also, they quoted the repair shop as saying it could cost up to $120 per hour. No one told them that is the standard rate. And over $950 of the repair cost was for the tail light and decal, which have nothing to do with the aluminum vs steel debate. What a waste of a "test".
 
   / The reality of aluminum body panels.
  • Thread Starter
#5  
"Even so, Edmunds Editor-in-Chief Scott Oldham says his team was surprised at how strong the F-150 was. “We were impressed with the resilience of the aluminum panel. We hit it and thought it would have far more damage than it did. So we hit it again. That was eye opening.”

So, if they did this to a steel truck would it have had much more damage to repair?
Also, Edmunds "estimated" someone could have repaired a steel truck in half the time, and at half the hourly rate. Also, they quoted the repair shop as saying it could cost up to $120 per hour. No one told them that is the standard rate. And over $950 of the repair cost was for the tail light and decal, which have nothing to do with the aluminum vs steel debate. What a waste of a "test".

Really?

It could not have been more clear.
When all was said and done, the bill to fix the bludgeoned pickup was $2,938.44, which included more than 20 hours of labor to straighten the panel, apply a specialized aluminum paint filler, then prime, paint, color sand and buff the panel. That was a discount, actually, because the Ford service technician took pity on the brand new truck owner (never identified as Edmunds to protect the integrity of the experiment) and charged him the regular $60-per-hour labor rate, instead of the $120-per-hour aluminum labor rate. If the dealer had charged the full $120 rate, Edmunds figures the bill would have come to $4,138.44 $1,800, or nearly 77 percent, more than the cost of repairing a steel panel for a typical 10 hours at $60 per hour.

Also was pretty clear that there are some up front costs for any body shop doing aluminum body panel repair. That is a clear disadvantage not to mention the labor rate. But in reality common sense could have told us all those things. It was the same reason the corvette was more expensive to repair back in the day with fiberglass body panels which few other cars used. I have no doubt that in time aluminum will become more popular and the disadvantage gap will close but there is clearly going to be increased costs associated with repairing aluminum panels and those costs will get passed along to the consumer one way or another through a bigger bill or increased insurance rates. There is no getting around who is going to pay for it in the end. I know some insurance companies don't pay for OEM new body panels in some cases which will be an issue until someone starts making aftermarket aluminum panels or possibly even replacing them with steel which I could see an insurance company trying to do in an effort to save money.

If you want to pretend none of this exists so be it but any auto manufacturers will face these issues with aluminum body panels on vehicles. It's not just a Ford issue. Plenty have done this already and who knows in 20 years it might be the norm but its' definitely not that popular just yet. I do think it is pretty cool that Ford is the first to try this in pickups but that also means they will endure a learning curve as they roll this out which will be expensive.
 
   / The reality of aluminum body panels. #6  
I think we will face issues with aluminum supply more than repair. I am neutral on an alum truck body at the moment. I see a weight advantage, but if it were the answer to all, the entire line of Ford vehicles would be aluminum. The problem there is it would price them off the market.

I wonder why no one has worried about the higher flammability issues of aluminum? It would make more sense to use it in a diesel, due to less chance of fuel ignition, running amuck.
 
   / The reality of aluminum body panels. #7  
So what about the aluminum.... did anyone notice the $887.00 tail light? YIKES! 1/50th of the cost of the truck is one tail light!
 
   / The reality of aluminum body panels. #8  
I work at a body shop and cringe when we have to bill people for aluminum replacement parts. Most are more than double a comparable steel part. And they are much less reparable.
The insurance rates are going to be a killer on that pickup. I think I'll stay with my 2005 model.
 
   / The reality of aluminum body panels. #9  
I work at a body shop and cringe when we have to bill people for aluminum replacement parts. Most are more than double a comparable steel part. And they are much less reparable.
The insurance rates are going to be a killer on that pickup. I think I'll stay with my 2005 model.

Yes and no. I have a 2012 FX4 Ecoboost and I got a rate check on a 2015 identical truck. It was about 10% more than my 2012. Just for shats and grins I got the rates on a 2015 Ram and Silverado that were comparable and both were a few dollars more than the F150.

So far the higher rate thing is a myth!

Theft, safety, ect play just as big of a part.

Chris
 
   / The reality of aluminum body panels. #10  
Someone should tell landrover about this. They have only been doing aluminium panels since 1948 so we should stop them before it ruins their business.
;-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 
Top