woolyAcres
Platinum Member
@California-
Thanks for your latest post. I think I'll start by removing the worst cylinder and seeing if I can rebuild it. I really just want to get this loader to work well enough to move those piles of dirt, knowing full well I won't be filling that giant bucket. Once I convince myself (and wife) this tractor/FEL are worth having around, I'll have more interest, time, money, motivation to rework it. My loader projects (at least near-term) are nearly all material moving - dirt, mulch, gravel, manure, etc.
I'm hopeful I can turn that rear-mount PTO driven pump into some money for redoing the loader components. I have no idea how far I'll get with that but we'll see.
Thankfully my loader valve and 3PT lift-lever are both on the right side of the tractor so it's pretty unlikely that I'd operate both at the same causing damage to the valve. I really like your suggestion of using the front pump to run the loader. I looked over the front pto link you posted above. The only thing that looked similar was the cut-out in my hood. I suppose that gives room to open the hood even when there's a shaft sticking beyond the front bumper. My pump is actually mounted directly below the battery, completely within the footprint of the tractor so there's no interference with the hood. I need to figure out how to connect that to the shaft sticking forward from the engine and then make use of that for the loader.
Regarding the SSQA style, you're certainly right that these are light tractors. My argument is that by removing the bucket for lifting something like your water tank I could pick up an extra 150#. Though the same could probably be done with a pin-on bucket. However, sharing pallet forks, even if I couldn't pick up half what the big machine can lift, would be pretty handy. Sharing some stuff with the bigger machine would be really helpful but I'm not sure that 5' brush hog can be shared. That gave my tractor all it could handle during my test at lunch.
Thanks for your latest post. I think I'll start by removing the worst cylinder and seeing if I can rebuild it. I really just want to get this loader to work well enough to move those piles of dirt, knowing full well I won't be filling that giant bucket. Once I convince myself (and wife) this tractor/FEL are worth having around, I'll have more interest, time, money, motivation to rework it. My loader projects (at least near-term) are nearly all material moving - dirt, mulch, gravel, manure, etc.
I'm hopeful I can turn that rear-mount PTO driven pump into some money for redoing the loader components. I have no idea how far I'll get with that but we'll see.
Thankfully my loader valve and 3PT lift-lever are both on the right side of the tractor so it's pretty unlikely that I'd operate both at the same causing damage to the valve. I really like your suggestion of using the front pump to run the loader. I looked over the front pto link you posted above. The only thing that looked similar was the cut-out in my hood. I suppose that gives room to open the hood even when there's a shaft sticking beyond the front bumper. My pump is actually mounted directly below the battery, completely within the footprint of the tractor so there's no interference with the hood. I need to figure out how to connect that to the shaft sticking forward from the engine and then make use of that for the loader.
Regarding the SSQA style, you're certainly right that these are light tractors. My argument is that by removing the bucket for lifting something like your water tank I could pick up an extra 150#. Though the same could probably be done with a pin-on bucket. However, sharing pallet forks, even if I couldn't pick up half what the big machine can lift, would be pretty handy. Sharing some stuff with the bigger machine would be really helpful but I'm not sure that 5' brush hog can be shared. That gave my tractor all it could handle during my test at lunch.