Reducing pollution is contributing to global warming?

[kenmbz]

I had a chuckle reading this article

Reduced Sulfur Emissions Could Cause Climate Shock

When we talk about emissions these days, we typically talk about cutting them back for the good of the environment. However, the climate system is a complex beast, and one we’re still learnin…

hackaday.com

In summary, some scientists are saying reducing sulphur emissions and sulphur content in our fuels might be contributing to global warming. Governments are mandating lower sulphur contents because sulphur compounds are bad for the environment. Researchers say these aerosolized sulphur compounds reflect sunlight. The effect of lowering sulphur emissions might be contributing to global warming.

This article seems to be based on no data, no scientists mentioned and no sources.
Even if it is correct, this article is purely an opinion piece.

 

[kenmbz]

My next article is due to unpublished and non-peer reviewed data. Everyone needs to send me one dollar.

 

[cqaigy2]

The audacious PR plot that seeded doubt about climate change

 

[kenmbz]

The audacious PR plot that seeded doubt about climate change

Facts and documentation and based on research. Even an interview with one of the players.

 

[Raul-02]

Bombshell study:

According to that study the "adjustments" that researchers routinely make to the thermal data they collect is biased in only one direction; warmer.
Hmmmmmm.
It's not a study of variables in the wild it is merely a hard look at the things researchers are doing to their data before they do any analysis.
Now pray tell, why would researchers manipulate their adjustments in only one direction? Why always average up? Couldn't possibly have anything to do with the likelihood of them getting more grant money - - could it?

 

[Larry Caldwell]

That is all supposition. Dosen't matter hs uses idiotic words like proof. Scientists don't use language like that; Partisans and religious nuts do.

Hint: Co2 is heavier than air.
How long can a Co2 molecule hold onto this heat? Not even a tenth of a second. It has to reradiate it almost instantly. A cloud of the Co2 gas (gas in a balloon) can hold heat for a fair time because it bounces inside the cloud but that can't happen in a larger atmosphere plus the desorption direction is completely random. So there's as much chance of the reradiated bit of energy making its way into space as there is going in the other direction.
But where in the atmosphere is all thisCo2?

 

[Larry Caldwell]

Bombshell study: Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Government Climate Data

Bombshell study: Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Government Climate Data - Watts Up With That?

Guest essay by Michael Bastasch A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.” “Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data...

wattsupwiththat.com

Which government? It's a global problem, you know. Climate doesn't stop at the border. Other countries take it much more seriously than the US does. We waffled out of the Paris Accords because of the denialist movement in the US.

 

[Doughknob]

Bombshell study: Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Government Climate Data

Bombshell study: Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Government Climate Data - Watts Up With That?

Guest essay by Michael Bastasch A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.” “Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data...

wattsupwiththat.com

This is fake news. Really?.....................

 

[Doughknob]

What?...you're seeking moral support ?...the only place you'll get it is from other gullible souls...!

thats what i thought.........

 

[/pine]

Which government? It's a global problem, you know. Climate doesn't stop at the border. Other countries take it much more seriously than the US does. We waffled out of the Paris Accords because of the denialist movement in the US.

It's only the zealots (gullible masses) that use the term "denialist"....there is nobody with more than a few working brain cells that doesn't realize the planet's climate is changing or cycling...like it's done since the beginning...!
It's all about the money...just ask al gore...