3320 and the 448 hard at work

[plastikosmd]

Well I started on the 400 ft rock wall I need to build. I got this old rock sled to help with the big stuff.

Sadly the rocks are too much for the allis so out came the Deere

A handy way to back the sled into position

I had thought of getting a thumb for the hoe. I'm glad I never did. This hoe is very strong. A thumb would limit what I could lift in some ways. Soda can on rock in bucket for size. It has no trouble with stuff this size.

 

[Cocre]

Nice. I have a 3320 with a 447. It is a good hoe, but I could use the power of the 448 at times.

 

[plastikosmd]

It is a heavy bugger. I use the outriggers to help assist when hooking it up. Still just a 2 min job. Takes longer to pin the 3pt back on.

 

[sunnyside360]

Your 3320 with 448 BH lifting those large rocks sure looks impressive. I have a 4320 with 485 BH and doubt if it will handle those size loads. But, I've always suspected the maximum hydraulic pressure setting on mine may be too low. Anyways, that's the reason we have such equipment. :thumbsup:

 

[CinderSchnauzer]

Your 3320 with 448 BH lifting those large rocks sure looks impressive. I have a 4320 with 485 BH and doubt if it will handle those size loads. But, I've always suspected the maximum hydraulic pressure setting on mine may be too low. Anyways, that's the reason we have such equipment. :thumbsup:

I used to be more up to date on the JD BH specs. It is my recollection the 447/475 and the 448/485 have the same specs, the main difference being the setback of the mounting platform so they can be used on a CAB tractor.

 

[Cocre]

The 448 is a good deal more powerful. My 447 can snatch the tractor around fairly easily with the bucket at its max reach, I can imagine that the 448 could take you for a wild ride if you let it.



Model 448
NOTE: Dimensions are given for backhoe with boom pivot pin 43cm (17
in.) above ground.
Digging Depth (A) (see note below) 2.67 m (105 in.)
Weight, With Large Frame Adapter and 24” Bucket 662 kg (1460 lb)
Weight, With Medium Frame Adapter and 24” Bucket 644 kg (1420 lb)
Swing Arc 180 degrees
Loading Height (bucket at 60°) (B) 2.24 m (88 in.)
Reach From Center Line of Swing Pivot (C) 3.61 m (142 in.)
Transport Height (D) 2.29 m (90 in.)
Bucket Rotation 180 degrees
Loading Reach (bucket at 60°) (E) 1.17 m (46 in.)
Transport Overhang (F) 1.32 m (52 in.)
Undercut (G) 56 cm (22 in.)
Stabilizers Spread Width (Raised) 1.37 m (54 in.)
Stabilizers Spread Width (Lowered) 2.51 m (99 in.)
Boom Lift Capacity (see note below) 372 kg (820 lb)
SAE Dipperstick Digging Force 10,83 kN (2435 lb)
SAE Bucket Digging Force 16,59 kN (3730 lb)
Bucket Control Main Relief Valve Pressure 17,58 MPa (2550 psi)
Digging Depth: 61cm (24 in.) flat bottom.
Boom Lift Capacity: Dipper arm and boom extended, lifting with boom cylinder only, weight attached at bucket
pivot, bucket pivot 91cm (36 in.) above ground.
Model 447
NOTE: Dimensions are given for backhoe with boom pivot pin 40.6cm (16
in.) above ground.
Digging Depth (A) (see note below) 2.34 m (92 in.)
Weight, With RSA Side Plate Kit and 20” Bucket 469 kg (1035 lb)
Swing Arc 180 degrees
Loading Height (bucket at 60°) (B) 1.99 m (78.5 in.)
Reach From Center Line of Swing Pivot (C) 3.15 m (124 in.)
Transport Height (D) 2.06 m (81 in.)
Bucket Rotation 180 degrees
Loading Reach (bucket at 60°) (E) 1.09 m (43 in.)
Transport Overhang (F) 1.14 m (45 in.)
Undercut (G) 44 cm (17.5 in.)
Stabilizers Spread Width (Raised) 1.55 m (61 in.)
Stabilizers Spread Width (Lowered) 2.26 m (89 in.)
Boom Lift Capacity (see note below) 270 kg (595 lb)
SAE Dipperstick Digging Force 909 kN (2005 lb)
SAE Bucket Digging Force 1288 kN (2840 lb)
Bucket Control Main Relief Valve Pressure 15,51 MPa (2250 psi)
Digging Depth: 61cm (24 in.) flat bottom.

 

[cartod]

Awesome. I just bit the bullet last week and bought the 485 for my 3320. I cant wait to finish my walls, should make it much easier on my back this year.

 

[CinderSchnauzer]

The 448 is a good deal more powerful. My 447 can snatch the tractor around fairly easily with the bucket at its max reach, I can imagine that the 448 could take you for a wild ride if you let it.

I was trying to say the 447/475 are the same and the 448/485 are the same, except for mount.

Did not mean to imply the 447/448 were the same. As per posted specs, there is a big difference.

 

[plastikosmd]

well for it's size, it can lift whatever I tackle, any more I would worry about tractor stability so it is sized perfect imho. pretty much the same for the loader 300cx. It will handle whatever I can throw at it, any more and I would probably break something or tip.

 

[Cocre]

I was trying to say the 447/475 are the same and the 448/485 are the same, except for mount.

Did not mean to imply the 447/448 were the same. As per posted specs, there is a big difference.

I see what you were saying now. I often seem to make the wrong conclusion when wording can be taken in more than one way. At least that is what the wife always tells me.