jigs_n_fixtures
Platinum Member
I want a grapple on the rock bucket for my tiny tractor. I can get the add on kit, and mount one up to my existing bucket with no real issues. Except I don’t have a third function going forward. The after market kit, with soft hoses, is about $800. The manufacturer‘s version with hard lines is about $1200.
So, I started wondering about running a grapple with an electric actuator. Most of them are far too undersized. However, I found an Electro-Hydraulic actuator on eBay, which consists of a double acting 12-Volt electric pump, (like is used on dump trailers), with about a 1-quart reservoir, directly coupled to a double acting hydraulic cylinder. Ten inch stroke, about 2400-pounds of force. I sent a message to the seller to find out what the rod and pin diameters are.
At $230 with free shipping, plus about another hundred for wiring, connectors, controls: This seems like it might be far less expensive than running a third hydraulic circuit forward. The loader control handle has three positions for switches built in. So, I could do a really clean installation Which would function as well or batter than the hydraulic forward.
Anyone seeing down sides I’m missing this approach?
Alternatively I could get one of the self contained pump and reservoir assemblies and mount it to the tractor body, and run the hydraulics forward. Still considerably less than buying third forward kit. Anyone see downsides to this approach?
So, I started wondering about running a grapple with an electric actuator. Most of them are far too undersized. However, I found an Electro-Hydraulic actuator on eBay, which consists of a double acting 12-Volt electric pump, (like is used on dump trailers), with about a 1-quart reservoir, directly coupled to a double acting hydraulic cylinder. Ten inch stroke, about 2400-pounds of force. I sent a message to the seller to find out what the rod and pin diameters are.
At $230 with free shipping, plus about another hundred for wiring, connectors, controls: This seems like it might be far less expensive than running a third hydraulic circuit forward. The loader control handle has three positions for switches built in. So, I could do a really clean installation Which would function as well or batter than the hydraulic forward.
Anyone seeing down sides I’m missing this approach?
Alternatively I could get one of the self contained pump and reservoir assemblies and mount it to the tractor body, and run the hydraulics forward. Still considerably less than buying third forward kit. Anyone see downsides to this approach?