Opinionated reply: For a given tire size, being air pressure dependent, especially at lower air pressures, your main concern would be "rolling circumference". Since you said "I put", past tense, you already mixed them. I'd get on soft ground in 4wd and make some zippers. Tweak your radial air pressure (should be the most sensitive to this trial) until you don't see any squirming on either set of tire marks. That would be what I would do.
Fronts are auxillary power so main drive needs to be rears. Any differences should favor rears with no sliding marks. Course in turns you want the fronts pulling you around the turn rather than the rears pushing straight ahead and forcing the fronts to slide/being pushed through the turn.....analogous to a front wheel drive sedan pulling you through a turn vs a rear wheel drive pushing the fronts for an example.
I noticed European farming Utube videos where large 4wd, radial equipped, farm tractors pump up the tires for road use and once on the field deflate the tires. I would assume 2wd is used on the road and it's obvious 4wd was the necessity in the field. So pumping them up for road use may have been to reduce sidewall flexing for longer tire life, not an attempt to maintain the proper drive ratio between fronts and rears.
I have mixed the two on drive and driven vehicles on the road and with 4 ply type tires, the radials will squirm while the bias won't and makes for a funny feel, not unsafe, just different. I would prefer bias on the fronts with a FEL if mixing, unless the fronts are near the diameter of the rears, like older Fords, JD, and IH machines I have seen.