They do seem to cause gas to splash back out if you fill them too fast.The no-spill spouts are garbage but the flame arrestors are cheap, effective, and harmless. The EPA definitely gets some things wrong but this isn't one of them.
They do seem to cause gas to splash back out if you fill them too fast.The no-spill spouts are garbage but the flame arrestors are cheap, effective, and harmless. The EPA definitely gets some things wrong but this isn't one of them.
They do seem to cause gas to splash back out if you fill them too fast.
This is a perfect example of government stepping into areas it has no business! While they try to micromanage our lives they are neglecting the two primary functions of our federal government, protecting lives and protecting property.From:
CPSC Requires Lifesaving Flame Mitigation Devices on Gas Cans and Other Portable Fuel Containers
"Many burn incidents involve liquid fuel used on a backyard fire pit, a campfire, a bonfire or burning trash."
Bruce
The issue here is they don't stop adding more regulation and expense.....checked out California lately. The EPA has a history of being politically coerced and mired in bureaucracy. They have very little credibility left....so this is why the flags go up.The no-spill spouts are garbage but the flame arrestors are cheap, effective, and harmless. The EPA definitely gets some things wrong but this isn't one of them.
Holy cow! I think i'll hold on to my 20+ year old plastic "cans", plus they don't condense as much water out inside.Still the best
Those cans above best ever made ,Though Ouch price has gone thru roof ,
Still compared to what's out today ...............
Here's how I roll, if it's a safety device which is a hassle to use, it's not a safety device I choose to use. Instead, I rely on being careful, and not doing doing stupid/reckless sh*t. And if that alone won't prevent a mishap, I chalk it up to fate.The best flame arrestor is using your brains when dealing with flammable materials.