Pictures of BX2660

[MessickFarmEqu]

Pictures are attached. Going from memory, this is a 700-800 premium over the 2350. Your getting an extra 3 Hp (bigger block), all metal construction, 20% larger radiator, and a realy nice tilt back seat.

[ChuckinNH]

Thanks for the photos Neil. Does it have the same gage cluster as the 2350? Looks like tires, wheelbase, etc. are all the same. Is it the same engine they are using in the B2620?

[MessickFarmEqu]

Its the D1005 block. I can't say off the top of my head what else thats used in. Yea, its hte same gauges, tires, frame, etc.

[Tom_H]

O.K., who's going to be first to put a BH6000 on this and see how it compares to a BX24?

Neil, this thing is too small for a Woods BH-70X isn't it?

[ChuckinNH]

It is identical in size to a BX2350

[David_Kb7uns]

Originally Posted by MessickFarmEqu

Its the D1005 block. I can't say off the top of my head what else thats used in.

Think it is used in the ZD326

David Kb7uns

[tutorbell]

Originally Posted by ChuckinNH

Is it the same engine they are using in the B2620?

I have a B2320, and it has the D1005 engine. The BX2660 must be running it at higher RPM to get the 26 HP figure. The B2620 has the D1105.

[Tom_H]

Originally Posted by tutorbell

I have a B2320, and it has the D1005 engine. The BX2660 must be running it at higher RPM to get the 26 HP figure. The B2620 has the D1105.

In a previous thread, Neil Messick said that the engine has more CCs. It has higher hp and higher torque. The hp is not via higher rpm at the expense of torque.

[MessickFarmEqu]

Originally Posted by Tom_H

In a previous thread, Neil Messick said that the engine has more CCs. It has higher hp and higher torque. The hp is not via higher rpm at the expense of torque.

It has more displacment than the BX2350. It is the same block as whats in the 2320, which runs at 2800 RPMS, the BX2660 runs at 3200 RPMS like all the subcompacts. So in comparison to the BX2350 the BX2660 is generating more HP and more torque. Compared to a B2320 its generating more HP, but probably not more torque. Thats a pretty basic explination, I'm no engineer and I am sure its more complicated than that as there are many other variables.

[tutorbell]

Originally Posted by Tom_H

In a previous thread, Neil Messick said that the engine has more CCs. It has higher hp and higher torque. The hp is not via higher rpm at the expense of torque.

I'm not disputing that it has more displacement than the BX2350. All I'm saying is that in the BX2660 application of this engine, the increase in HP above the B2320 is a result of the increased RPM.

BX2350 with D902: 23 HP gross at 3200 RPM
BX2660 with D1005: 26 HP gross at 3200 RPM
B2320 with D1005: 23 HP gross at 2800 RPM