I also have a fairly small machine with a loader (JD 4100). At first I was disappointed that the loader hydraulics stalled when trying to dig and fill the bucket from a large pile. After I learned how to scoop efficiently, now it doesn't bother me.
One other thing comes to mind, though. If the hydraulic capacity was increased, the amount of
ballast on the rear would need to be increased proportionately to keep the machine safe. Otherwise, when you did bite off more than it could safely lift, instead of stalling, you would find the machine tipping face-first into the pile!
Increasing the ballast quickly leads to needing more power to get all that weight to move around and not get stuck. Its a cycle that is counter to the idea of having a small, light-weight machine in the first place.
Another thought is to use a smaller bucket. My JD can mount a 48, 54, or 60 inch bucket. I wanted the 54, but the dealer talked me into taking the 60 (because that is what he had in stock). At first, I thought about taking the bucket back and making the dealer get me a 48 because it would keep me from trying to load more than the machine could lift. However, later, as I learned how to use the machine efficiently, there are many reasons to keep the large bucket. Even if it can't dig and lift a full bucket of wet, sticky clay from the bottom of a tightly packed pile, when using the bucket for spreading and leveling, wider is better, and lighter materials like loose sand, or removed sod, etc, the bigger bucket is just right.
- Rick