<font color="blue">From what I understand about tractor motors, 6000 hours is pretty early to blow one up, so I'd have to say that 200 hr frequency was not sufficient. </font>
I don't think I can get on board with 6,000 hours being "pretty early", nor do I think that any appreciable engine longevity can be achieved by using drain intervals that are shorter than those recommended by the manufacturer, assuming that your oil (dino or synthetic) is doing its job.
Evidence for the latter can be found in many studies of European maintenance practices in which considerably longer drain intervals than those used in the US result in no measurable increase in wear or failure.
If your manufacturer specifies a drain interval of 100 or 200 hours and an API spec, and you have engine problems, I'd have to think that your "oil of choice" has probably let you down. If you use oil x (dino or synthetic) and oil tests come back with good numbers at the mfrs. drain intervals, with the oil holding up well and no sign of abnormal wear of internal engine components, I can't see any need to reduce the drain interval. If the tests come back with bad numbers, I'd change my brand and quality of oil (dino or synthetic) before I reduced my drain interval.
So - could the 6,000-hr. engine have lasted 8,000 - 10,000 hours if the oil had been changed twice as often? First, I tend to doubt it. Second, even if it would have, when you figure in the time and materials for all the extra oil changes, depending on the price tag you put on your time I can see that adding up close to the cost of a new engine anyway.
As usual, no easy answers, and probably more than one way to get the job done in a cost-effective way.