Look what i did yesterday: i put the trailer through the ultimate test
We had 23 square bales from 1.3 hectare, it was a quite heavy 2nd cut.
I could do 11 and 12 bales in 2 times, but i wanted to compare my theoretical calculations to everyday farm practice: I took all 20 bales i could load, and then returned for the remaining 3... not very logical, but the trailer held, thats all i wanted to know.
The tires would allmost crack, but the frame didnt budge
I guess this is 300 to 350 kg per bale, so 6 or 7 ton load.
Because of the short wheelbase and high CoG, the trailer was very wavy on the road: Lateral movement was non-existent, just as i expected, and the reason why i wanted to go tandem instead of turntable steered. The heavy tongue load makes it track very well. It was just the wavy bounce of the tractors rear axle that was unexpected: But if i stick to loading 2 layers of bales on this trailer, instead of 3, the CoG will be 2 feet lower and the ride much better.
We had 23 square bales from 1.3 hectare, it was a quite heavy 2nd cut.
I could do 11 and 12 bales in 2 times, but i wanted to compare my theoretical calculations to everyday farm practice: I took all 20 bales i could load, and then returned for the remaining 3... not very logical, but the trailer held, thats all i wanted to know.
The tires would allmost crack, but the frame didnt budge
I guess this is 300 to 350 kg per bale, so 6 or 7 ton load.
Because of the short wheelbase and high CoG, the trailer was very wavy on the road: Lateral movement was non-existent, just as i expected, and the reason why i wanted to go tandem instead of turntable steered. The heavy tongue load makes it track very well. It was just the wavy bounce of the tractors rear axle that was unexpected: But if i stick to loading 2 layers of bales on this trailer, instead of 3, the CoG will be 2 feet lower and the ride much better.