My 770 has been a tough little machine, but I try to use 4x4 sparingly. But there are some notablbe changes from the 770 to the 790.
1st, I noticed that the front axle is different. May be stronger or weaker, but its definately a different axle.
2nd, as another poster mentioned, the 770 and early 790's used a model 70 loader, with 54" bucket. And I assure you, the 70 is not a power house. A full bucket of wet gravel has the pressure relief open. Newer loaders, bigger buckets, & high pressure relief settings will put much more pressure on the front axle.
A thing to remember is that the front axle is Mechanical Front Wheel Assist. Not 4x4. Extrodinary forces are produced when digging into a pile, scooping and backing out. Add in the fact that the gear drive makes it difficult to fill the bucket without spinning the tires is worse. Imagine those spinning front tires, suddenly loaded with the weight of scooping bucket full and a quick shift to reverse. I bet the hydro tractors (like the Yanmar/Cub) don't have these issues even with the same frontend.
I've had this in mind when I bought my 770. So when I do loader work, I run it in 2wd with enough
ballast to give me moderate traction. Yes, I get some wheel spin. But is easier on the frontend, and I benefit from not slipping the clutch as much.
To the poster who broke his tractor in half: If you broke a 790 in half, you are doing something very wrong. And if you think a Ford/NH will work better for you, my advice would be to seach all the threads on broken tractors. You may change your mind.