LD1
Epic Contributor
The MAX 22 and 25 aren't quite B, or 2000 size. The MAX 28 XL is B, or 2000 size. The little MAX comes up quite short when compared to either of those. The little MAX is in between SCUT and CUT, so they basically have no peers to be compared with. Nice move on mahindra's part, a niche tractor that has more street appeal than the 1815 and 1816 that it replaced. Maybe mahindra max owners don't post on forums, but it seems like the green and orange are the only SCUTS flying off dealer floors. I'm not biased, I have it out for all brands of small tractor. :O
I'll give you that on the 22 and 25. Its a nitch tractor. Someone may want something a little bigger than a BX, and then it does look enticing.
I wonder if kubota were to put the "max" on "their" competitive comparison and compair it to the B series. Then kubota can "claim" stronger hydraulics, more "built in weight", better lift, yada yada yada.
The Max28 is B & 20-series sized machine. Yet they choose to compare it to a MUCH smaller tractor. THAT is the gripe I have. It's one thing if there isnt a direct comparison, and you fit 1/2 way in between two competitors models, and you choose the smaller one. I dont have a problem with that. But when you build one the EXACT same size with nearly IDENTICAL specs, and then act like you re-invented the wheel. In fact, I really dont know of any other tractors from any manufacture that compare as closely as the max 28, B, and 2x20