Wagtail
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 11,944
- Location
- St Helens, Tasmania, Australia
- Tractor
- JD 4105 / JD Z355E (48" deck)
So, does the ssqa actually weigh 132# or what?
:laughing: Yes, the SSQA weighs 132 lbs/pounds/#.
So, does the ssqa actually weigh 132# or what?
:laughing: Yes, the SSQA weighs 132 lbs/pounds/#.
Ok, what's the JD QA weigh?
The JD QA is incorporated as part of the FEL (a 300CX in my case).
I'm still glad I went with m111 since they will not be permanently irrigated. Nearer to the house I plan to have some trellised trees but I am going to experiment with lower watering techniques. And I am definitely going to have a cistern to collect rain water off the roof of house and barn.I have a few dozen apple trees on M111, I like that rootstock. Nowhere near the 385 as you have. They can grow to near seedling size as I am sure you know. Very hardy.
Not a good answer. If it were to come off to be replaced by the universal SSQA, there would not be 132# added. The amount added would be 132#- whatever the Deere coupler weighs.
Sorry about that. I didn't understand the the question... correctly I guess. Hence the "confused" icon. As Tx Jim has provided (thank you) a breakdown of my FEL, a SSQA would have to be added to, not replace, the existing attachment configuration.
Further to my confusion is my lack of knowledge of other tractor FEL attachment configurations and/or methods. I've only ever owned/operated my JD 4105 and I only have the two FEL implements; which are simple to swap around... which is a good thing for me as I'm a very simple man.