Darren
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2002
- Messages
- 1,055
- Location
- WVa
- Tractor
- Kubota L3710, Ford 5600, Case MB4/94, Kubota B6200
Terry, I've never liked the idea of using a plow. There's a book from before the fifties, The Plowman's Folly that makes a good case for not plowing. No till seems to be the "modern" way of avoiding plowing and the associated soil losses. Bare soil is exposed and vulnerable. The area where I'm located had one of the highest erosion rates fifty or sixty years ago.
Even today there's minimal top soil. If I find over an inch, it's a lot. Even the woods where cattle grazed in the early 1900's when it wasn't forested has little top soil. A forester told me it would take lifetimes to recover naturally. Today I went up to the top of the ridge to get a wagon load of field stone for a wall. Sometime before 1914, whoever owned the land cleared the semi-level land on top of the ridge to grow corn and piled all of the rock in two places.
The pile of rocks hasn't been touched for at least 90 years and maybe way longer. I was amazed at how deep the leaf mold and debris was in places on top of the rocks. In some places it was probably 2" thick. In the woods it's less than that.
Even today there's minimal top soil. If I find over an inch, it's a lot. Even the woods where cattle grazed in the early 1900's when it wasn't forested has little top soil. A forester told me it would take lifetimes to recover naturally. Today I went up to the top of the ridge to get a wagon load of field stone for a wall. Sometime before 1914, whoever owned the land cleared the semi-level land on top of the ridge to grow corn and piled all of the rock in two places.
The pile of rocks hasn't been touched for at least 90 years and maybe way longer. I was amazed at how deep the leaf mold and debris was in places on top of the rocks. In some places it was probably 2" thick. In the woods it's less than that.