pappy19
Silver Member
Red-
You raise some very good points. The biggest issue now is that there are no logging operations at all to pay for the cost of forest management. As far as re-seeding and thinning goes, the old method of taking care of the slash on a clear cut used to be a broadcast burn, more like nature. Someone got the brilliant idea to windrow the slash and then burn. All that does is open the scarred ground for weeds and brush, and it makes the ground under the slash pile sterile from too much heat. When I would do regeration surveys as a young forester on clear cuts, I always found more seedlings on the broadcast burn areas vs windrowed and burned. I am not saying that the USFS shouldn't take the blame for making most of the mistakes. In fact one of the biggest errors they made was the transfering of foresters every 2-3 years. All that did was allow for the next forester to blame the one that set up the timber sale, no responsibility. Also, the USFS has never had much of an erosion prevention training, only erosion control. Most of the time when there was an erosion problem, it was too late to take care of the proplem. The logging industry needed to be pro-active, but alas, that might eat into their profits. All parties were remiss in this area of erosion and in the end, that was the straw.....and the enviro's won on all counts. Now you have no forest management at all, except for trying to put out fires. I wish you luck in that regard.
You raise some very good points. The biggest issue now is that there are no logging operations at all to pay for the cost of forest management. As far as re-seeding and thinning goes, the old method of taking care of the slash on a clear cut used to be a broadcast burn, more like nature. Someone got the brilliant idea to windrow the slash and then burn. All that does is open the scarred ground for weeds and brush, and it makes the ground under the slash pile sterile from too much heat. When I would do regeration surveys as a young forester on clear cuts, I always found more seedlings on the broadcast burn areas vs windrowed and burned. I am not saying that the USFS shouldn't take the blame for making most of the mistakes. In fact one of the biggest errors they made was the transfering of foresters every 2-3 years. All that did was allow for the next forester to blame the one that set up the timber sale, no responsibility. Also, the USFS has never had much of an erosion prevention training, only erosion control. Most of the time when there was an erosion problem, it was too late to take care of the proplem. The logging industry needed to be pro-active, but alas, that might eat into their profits. All parties were remiss in this area of erosion and in the end, that was the straw.....and the enviro's won on all counts. Now you have no forest management at all, except for trying to put out fires. I wish you luck in that regard.