BeeferMan
Gold Member
Nothing like loading on one's own thread, right...
But here's more. I finally actually took the NH out and cut some hay yesterday, tractor ran well (when I could get it started) and I was happy with that part of it. But I again had trouble starting it. something was obviously intermittent in the safety start system - and it was getting way worse. So when I was done, I took it back to the barn and started to check it out. I found that the safety switch on the clutch was on its way out, it was way flaky. I jumpered around that and now it started every time, as it should. But in checking that switch out, I couldn't help but notice what a crappy design the mounting of that switch was. The switch is mounted to so that it opens (disables starting) when the pedal is the totally released position - but it closes (allows starting) with almost no motion of the pedal, i.e. press the pedal down about 1/2 inch and you can start the machine - way, way before the clutch actually releases. So IMO that's not a very effective safety switch, someone could easily start it with the clutch engaged, but think they were safe from that.
So I got to thinking - maybe a good way to put a end to this safety switch madness that litigation seemed to have caused would be to sue them for a poorly designed safety switch? Then they'd be less inclined to install so many of them for fear of being sued! I'm kidding, of course, but one can surely see the ridiculous ends continuing this CYA overreaction could bring us too.
But here's more. I finally actually took the NH out and cut some hay yesterday, tractor ran well (when I could get it started) and I was happy with that part of it. But I again had trouble starting it. something was obviously intermittent in the safety start system - and it was getting way worse. So when I was done, I took it back to the barn and started to check it out. I found that the safety switch on the clutch was on its way out, it was way flaky. I jumpered around that and now it started every time, as it should. But in checking that switch out, I couldn't help but notice what a crappy design the mounting of that switch was. The switch is mounted to so that it opens (disables starting) when the pedal is the totally released position - but it closes (allows starting) with almost no motion of the pedal, i.e. press the pedal down about 1/2 inch and you can start the machine - way, way before the clutch actually releases. So IMO that's not a very effective safety switch, someone could easily start it with the clutch engaged, but think they were safe from that.
So I got to thinking - maybe a good way to put a end to this safety switch madness that litigation seemed to have caused would be to sue them for a poorly designed safety switch? Then they'd be less inclined to install so many of them for fear of being sued! I'm kidding, of course, but one can surely see the ridiculous ends continuing this CYA overreaction could bring us too.