CT_Tree_Guy
Platinum Member
Larry -
I agree with you that there are many attachments that require much more hydraulic flow than is going to be supplied by the general class of CUT that are under consideration in this thread. That said, I'm going to stand behind my comments. I think my words were pretty carefully chosen: <font color="blue">"The hydraulic system itself doesn't really come into play too much; most tractors seem to have around a 2,500 PSI working pressure" </font>; especially when taken in the context in which they were expressed. Again, my comments were intended to apply to the type/size of tractor Rich or others have mentioned: Montana 2740, Case DX29, NHTC35, JD, Mahindra 2615/3015, JD-990, Kubota Grand L, etc. I feel that any of these machines will have adequate hydraulic flow to power any of his current or likely future needs, certainly including the loader and a front grapple, but also a backhoe as well. I just don't feel that this sentiment lends itself very well to being judged "totally true" or not "totally true".
As to: <font color="blue"> "It is just your logging operation where hydraulic GPM doesn't seem to be important for your personal uses" </font>: please bear in mind that the vast majority of the time, Rich is going to be using his tractor for the exact same purposes for which I use mine; namely, residential tree work. My intention in making my comments about hydraulic flow was to give Rich one less thing to concern himself with, since any of the tractors he has in mind will most likely give him all the flow he needs for what he's going to be doing.
John
I agree with you that there are many attachments that require much more hydraulic flow than is going to be supplied by the general class of CUT that are under consideration in this thread. That said, I'm going to stand behind my comments. I think my words were pretty carefully chosen: <font color="blue">"The hydraulic system itself doesn't really come into play too much; most tractors seem to have around a 2,500 PSI working pressure" </font>; especially when taken in the context in which they were expressed. Again, my comments were intended to apply to the type/size of tractor Rich or others have mentioned: Montana 2740, Case DX29, NHTC35, JD, Mahindra 2615/3015, JD-990, Kubota Grand L, etc. I feel that any of these machines will have adequate hydraulic flow to power any of his current or likely future needs, certainly including the loader and a front grapple, but also a backhoe as well. I just don't feel that this sentiment lends itself very well to being judged "totally true" or not "totally true".
As to: <font color="blue"> "It is just your logging operation where hydraulic GPM doesn't seem to be important for your personal uses" </font>: please bear in mind that the vast majority of the time, Rich is going to be using his tractor for the exact same purposes for which I use mine; namely, residential tree work. My intention in making my comments about hydraulic flow was to give Rich one less thing to concern himself with, since any of the tractors he has in mind will most likely give him all the flow he needs for what he's going to be doing.
John