chetlenox
Silver Member
Mickey, I definitely get the impression talking to local folks, that yield estimates around here can vary quit a bit based on the weather (last summer being an example of pretty severe drought). Now I've got a dumb question for you, I would assume I would want to double-up rows just for efficiency of baling, right? Just to get the job done faster? It wouldn't actually hurt the quality of the bale just to run down a "light" row and have it take more pumps of the plunger to make a full bale, right?
Thanks for the feedback KLM. To make myself feel better I looked up the specs on a Ford 8N and compared them to a 4320 (since I haven't really settled on which model of 4x20 yet):
Weight:
8N-2410 lbs
4320-3700 lbs
Engine HP:
8N-27HP
4320-48HP
Engine Torque:
8N-92 ft-lbs
4320-102 ft-lbs
On weight and HP, the new fancy machine is clearly ahead. It's interesting to see that the engine torque is actually pretty close. Of course, you could jack up the 4x20 torque to 115 or 134 ft-lbs by spending more cash on the 4520 or 4720. It's interesting that the Ford is generating pretty close to equivalent torque (compared to a 4120) with 20% less displacement (119 versus 148 cu-in for 8N and 4x20). But I think I'm starting to get a little spec nutty now.
Bottom line answer to my question seems to be: For my "hobby farmer" status, baling hay with a 4x20 series tractor is going to work just fine.
Thanks to everybody for their feedback. I really appreciate it.
Chet
Thanks for the feedback KLM. To make myself feel better I looked up the specs on a Ford 8N and compared them to a 4320 (since I haven't really settled on which model of 4x20 yet):
Weight:
8N-2410 lbs
4320-3700 lbs
Engine HP:
8N-27HP
4320-48HP
Engine Torque:
8N-92 ft-lbs
4320-102 ft-lbs
On weight and HP, the new fancy machine is clearly ahead. It's interesting to see that the engine torque is actually pretty close. Of course, you could jack up the 4x20 torque to 115 or 134 ft-lbs by spending more cash on the 4520 or 4720. It's interesting that the Ford is generating pretty close to equivalent torque (compared to a 4120) with 20% less displacement (119 versus 148 cu-in for 8N and 4x20). But I think I'm starting to get a little spec nutty now.
Bottom line answer to my question seems to be: For my "hobby farmer" status, baling hay with a 4x20 series tractor is going to work just fine.
Thanks to everybody for their feedback. I really appreciate it.
Chet