I agree Chris. Resale is a line the JD crowd uses to not feel so bad about over paying for green and yellow paint.
I am another who does not have the new every 2 year disease. New Paint fever has put alot of people in the poor house, so unless you put 10,000 hours on every 2 years, why bother worrying about resale.
99 time in 100, "resale value" is the mantra of those who're more concerned about impressing those around them with how much money they have to throw away. In most of thoses cases, they're actually trying to impress themselves.
I'm always at a loss as to how people can pay more, then get it back upon resale, and see that as "smarter" then paying "less" and getting THAT back upon resale. That's not RESALE VALUE. If they were in fact, getting "more for their dollar", that's a decent reason. But when "less" buys equal in many instances, "less" becomes "more". (or at the very least, "smarter" use of capital)
Example; I have one tractor that stickered for just over $66,000, and 2 that stickered for around $52,000. All three netted virtually the same income over the last year. All operated with virtually equal "reliability". (2 cheaper tractors actually ran on LESS fuel per hr....while commanding same hourly rate!) Looking at trading them on 3 new units. (2000+ hrs per year) "Average resale" on all three is right at 90% of what I paid new with hours/condition considered. 2 "cheaper" models tied up less operating capital, made equal money, and will re-sell for roughly same "value" (as compared to purchase price. All three are what would be considered very modern, very comfortable tractors. Which makes more sense?
With regard to those "10,000 hours every 2 years" tractors, they generally don't hold a strong resale value anyway. Excessive hours scare away "big dollars" when resale time comes.
You pay dearly for IMAGE. If that's really, really important for a persons self esteem, then I guess it's worth all that extra money...................Personally, I don't have self esteem issues, AND, I prefer to KEEP my money rather than make a corporate giant wealthier.