First of all, there are 2012-model 3005 tractors for sale at my local Deere dealer. We're still in the 2012 model year. I don't know how you want to define it, but I am thinking that if I can buy a new 2012-model Yanmar built Deere in the year 2012, then I feel pretty comfortable saying that in Yanmar makes the current model 3005. Feel free to come back and argue the minutiae on January 1 2013, or when Deere rolls out the official 2013 lineup minus a 3005.
Second, this is a dumb point to argue, as we consider that Yanmar-built 3005 to be a fine tractor, and I have no problem with it being built by Yanmar. In fact, it's done a heck of a lot better in the quality/reliability department than my neighbor's "non-Yanmar" 1026R, which has turned out to be a real hassle for him. The 3005 has a much beefier construction than many other Deeres due to it's legacy design.
I am not sure, but I seem to be detecting some attitude in the thread here that being Yanmar-built is a bad thing or something to look down on, and not as good as a "real" Deere. As if people need to defend against it or explain it away with weak excuses. That is a pointless and limiting attitude to have. There's no reason a Yanmar-built Deere couldn't be as good, or better than, a US-built Deere. My neighbor's experience with the 1026R is a perfect example.
Nope, no attitude. I just don't like people that comment on opinion, not fact. The answer to the original question is JD builds all of their CUTs except for the 2x20's and the no longer produced 3005, 4005, should I go on? I don't know why but it seems like every Deere thread turns bad :confused3: