Richard
Elite Member
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2000
- Messages
- 4,955
- Location
- Knoxville, TN
- Tractor
- International 1066 Full sized JCB Loader/Backhoe and a John Deere 430 to mow with
Looking for advice on: Using backhoe to topple standing tree, looking for the merits of the logic AND danger warnings.
I’ve been downing trees by either pushing them over to uproot the root ball, or cutting a notch in them and pushing them over then digging out root ball, or flat out cutting them down, again...then digging out root ball. The final goal is to get out the roots.
Last night I approached a large (dead) pine and ultimately did nothing, as it was getting dark. As I viewed the tree, a thought hit me and that brings me here.
Presume a tree not leaning any direction very much, if at all. Instead of felling the tree with saw or notching it, and having to dig out the root ball, what are the merits of digging on one side of the roots to loosen up the root ball (while entire tree is still standing) THEN, after roots are “loosened up” pushing the tree over? The thinking here is I could be in the cab during the entire operation, not having to use chain saw and can then push tree SPECIFICALLY in desired direction. By the way, my mental definition of loosening up the roots would be to dig on NO MORE than 1/2 of the circumference of the tree trunk.
If this were a common or acceptable (not to mention safe) way to down a tree, what side would you dig on? For example, would you dig on the “near” side creating a hole that the roots can pivot up into. This would theoretically leave the roots intact on the “far” side of the tree insuring /w3tcompact/icons/crazy.gif that the tree won’t fall towards you. OR, you could dig on the FAR side creating a hole that the tree could “fall into” a bit easier given that you would then be pushing on the opposite side.
How does the philosophy change if the tree has a specific lean?
In my retentive ways, I can see how either way could work. Which probably means neither one is too bright, so I thought I’d pose it here for some more experienced users comments prior to me going home tonight and attempting it.
Thanks for any thoughs.
I’ve been downing trees by either pushing them over to uproot the root ball, or cutting a notch in them and pushing them over then digging out root ball, or flat out cutting them down, again...then digging out root ball. The final goal is to get out the roots.
Last night I approached a large (dead) pine and ultimately did nothing, as it was getting dark. As I viewed the tree, a thought hit me and that brings me here.
Presume a tree not leaning any direction very much, if at all. Instead of felling the tree with saw or notching it, and having to dig out the root ball, what are the merits of digging on one side of the roots to loosen up the root ball (while entire tree is still standing) THEN, after roots are “loosened up” pushing the tree over? The thinking here is I could be in the cab during the entire operation, not having to use chain saw and can then push tree SPECIFICALLY in desired direction. By the way, my mental definition of loosening up the roots would be to dig on NO MORE than 1/2 of the circumference of the tree trunk.
If this were a common or acceptable (not to mention safe) way to down a tree, what side would you dig on? For example, would you dig on the “near” side creating a hole that the roots can pivot up into. This would theoretically leave the roots intact on the “far” side of the tree insuring /w3tcompact/icons/crazy.gif that the tree won’t fall towards you. OR, you could dig on the FAR side creating a hole that the tree could “fall into” a bit easier given that you would then be pushing on the opposite side.
How does the philosophy change if the tree has a specific lean?
In my retentive ways, I can see how either way could work. Which probably means neither one is too bright, so I thought I’d pose it here for some more experienced users comments prior to me going home tonight and attempting it.
Thanks for any thoughs.