Clearly the alaskan and granburg sp? saw attachments work, with the right combination of power and chain tweaking, but for this fifty year old, I don't see bending over and pushing a chainsaw as a healthy or back-friendly activity. I've seen some attachments that use the saw vertically, which makes a bit more sense to me. Now if the pushing/feeding part could be automated, it might take enough of the ooumph factor out of it to make it a doable, productive arrangement. (I'm really not daft enough to want to reinvent the obvious, but, on the other hand, don't see any point in paying high frieght and manufacturing bills when I'm basically gonna have to assemble the parts that they ship to me anyway.)
So here is the basic vision, unabashedly inspired by others sold elsewhere at high prices:
Build a fixed, (wood?) frame low to the ground that the log is dragged up to (with the new tractor, of course) and then pushed, and rolled onto with a peavy. A solidly-built pipe or welded angle iron frame box with v-wheels (pulleys might work?) would ride along the edge of two long angle iron rails, solidly secured to the wood frame, kinda like railroad tracks. The pipe frame arrangement would hold the saw bar top and bottom in a vertical configuration with a sideways adjustment mechanism (wormscrew?) to allow for thickness adjustment. Some sort of dog-type mechanisms would hold the log steady and securely, perhaps rigged from modified sliding clamps.
The feeding part is what I am not too clear about. I guess it could be a very long threaded rod that worked like a wormscrew, but probably easier would be some sort of cable or chain geared arrangement that could be powered by an off the shelf electrical motor, perhaps with variable speed.
Then (in theroy) the log is loaded and secured, the saw width adjustment set and locked, the chainsaw is fired up and the feed motor activated. I, in the meantime, stand back with the remote, sipping a cold one and monitoring the saw's progress. At the end of the run, the slab falls of its own weight and can be pulled safely aside. The width adjustment is reset, the log turned as needed, and we go back through it again.
Anyway, that's the short version. Am I nuts?, or do you think this would be worth the effort. I've got many trees, a thirst for more lumber than I can pay for and an aversion to burning it all when I know it can be turned into lumber. I would also like the convenience of a small mill to custom size materials as available. Drying sheds, proper sticking, a solar kiln and patience would complete the picture.