Actually, no...
Wouldn't it be cheaper just to teach drivers how to react to stuck throttles?
100.00000000000000000000% reliability.
quote]
Really? 100% reliability? Some of these crashes happened in a split second. Are you proposing that there should be a test to determine if you could react to a sticking throttle as a condition to get a license? Wow, talk about Big Government creeping into the individual life.
Your argument might hold water if it wasn't possible to design a car without a proper fail-safe mechanism but in reality it is possible, they just failed to do it.
You totally miscomprehended my post....one of my points is that there is a fail safe mechanism that does work...it's called the brakes, and another one is shutting down the engine, both of which work...
You also selectively cut and paste my point and tried to put my 100% reliability as if I was talking about drivers being 100%, what I said was that you cannot make a mechanical system that won't ever ever ever ever ever ever ever fail. As in your fail safe mechanism that YOU propose that the BIG GOVERNMENT should creep into our individual life.
One thing we need to understand is many people don't understand how a car works. Many people on this board have a pretty good understanding of how the different systems on a car function. The guy from California didn't say if he put his car in nuetral it would flip. What he said was he was worried it would go past nuetral and hit reverse and might flip. I don't think he really understands that most cars won't allow that, but I can't fault him for thinking that.
There is the old saying, where there is smoke there is fire. There is no doubt that Toyota has some kind of problem, the question is, and I don't think has been answered yet, is what is causing the problem.
Yes I heard that statement verbatim as well, I didn't paraphrase accurately enough but the point remains the same, some people have no clue about cars. Ridiculous to think that a car would flip over frontwards if slammed into reverse, park, anything. So I don't see why these handful of idiots that got into accidents with a toyota are any different then the handful of idiots that got into accidents in Audis and Volvos and Pintos should dictate yet one more irrelevant design feature in already overpriced vehicles from cash strapped manufacturers, yet in total there are way more accidents from normal human faults like drunk driving and inattention...maybe we should install ALL vehicles with a breathalyzer engine kill mandated at the federal level for the 60 or so drunk driving accidents this year,
oops, is that all there is in DWI accidents?:confused2: