It can be done but when functions are run off the same pump (the L48 has three) then one function draws hydraulic power from the other.
This is not so much a problem when flailing around in the air, but when engaged in heavy soil or clay it becomes more apparent. Using one function at a time will show the maximum power available.
The L48 is a nice piece of useful equipment but is nether an excavator nor a full-sized commercial backhoe.
Well then it is just a matter of re pluming it at the valve. Right?
Didn't say it does. Simply said the L48 has 3 pumps.
Well then it is just a matter of re pluming it at the valve. Right?
You clearly stated it has 3 pumps and inferred that some how it shares functions between the pumps. The point it has 3 pumps is as moot as mentioning it has 4 wheels and runs on diesel. It actually has 8 pumps on it (4 of which touch hydraulic fluid), but that's just as moot when mentioning backhoe hydraulics. The concern is that the hydraulics use 1 pump, and the swing function of the BH has a dedicated pump. There's no point in clouding an issue with useless information that has no relevancy to the man's question. The other 2 hydraulic pumps have nothing that can be utilized to drive the backhoe.
It probably could be done, but that's a rather expensive piece of equipment to be experimenting on! I'd look at adding a PTO pump for increased flow and pipe it in to feed the valve towards the end. Increasing the flow by 4-5 GPM would do the trick, if the valve could handle it. Way too many factors to consider for someone who doesn't own one. Backhoes usually have flow restrictors on them and being able to feed the valve as 2 separate valves with an equal flow divider in front may yield good results. I'm surprised kubota didn't just add a few more parts in there to increase its usefulness.