k0ua
Epic Contributor
Try Nova Scotia, 15% even on used vehicles....Mike
OK, now that IS bad!
Try Nova Scotia, 15% even on used vehicles....Mike
Washington state used to have that excise tax on vehicles to license annually. Very, very expensive until the taxpayers raised up on their hindfeet and passed an initiative limiting license fees to $30/year. That was back in the 70s or perhaps late 60s. Still $30/yr but they have found ways to tack on extra fees to it. Still under $100/yr though on a car or light truck.
Harry K
Death and taxes... I guess I should be happy it's taxes...
Fuel taxes are about the fairest way of raising that money since they are tied to those
who get the most benefit from the roads. Tolls on roads also work that way. Even with fuel taxes and tolls there are
drawbacks.
Yeah, there are definitely drawbacks. Oregon is the first state, I believe, that has tried to pass a new law that will
tax drivers based on miles driven. This is in response to the sales of electric cars, which pay no gas tax, and
plug-in hybrids, which pay very little. If I recall, the tax would apply to those getting over 55MPG-equivalent.
How ironic: after massive federal and state subsidies of electric cars, they turn around and tax folks for the cars that
were promoted, due to the lost revenue.
I have not heard how they would monitor miles driven, or even if the law passed. Anyone from OR?
Me too. Worse yet in Maine I'd be writing another $2xxx check a year later for annual excise tax on a $60K new vehicle.
Money for roads has to come from somewhere. Fuel taxes are about the fairest way of raising that money since they are tied to those who get the most benefit from the roads. Tolls on roads also work that way. Even with fuel taxes and tolls there are drawbacks.
Federal and State fuel taxes are open to being spent for the wrong things or in the wrong places. Fuel taxes at the local level aren't very efficient to administer and lacking a gas station, I don't know how my town would collect them. Even if perfectly used there is still the distribution overhead of deciding who gets what and the administrative overhead of handling the revenue. Toll roads often generate more revenue than is needed and the excess goes into a state's general fund. Private toll roads operated for-profit are another can of worms.
100% of vehicle excise taxes are used for road upkeep in my location and it is used as decided very locally with minimal overhead. Those taxes have nothing to do with how much a person uses the roads though and that is a drawback. Road upkeep revenue from property or income taxes also lacks fairness.
I don't know of any perfect method of getting revenue for road upkeep. It seems like most places get a little here, a little there, and that sort of evens out any inherent unfairness from one person to another.
Wish it was just sales tax, local city just passed a pavement tax, paved driveway is going to cost you. Storm water runoff control is the reason. County usually follows suit about two years later. Sad part, city is trying to figure out how to spend 2.6 million surplus. Between taxes and insurance, I can barely affort to live in this counrty. My days of being middle class are slipping away fast. I think there is a reason why state capitals are surrended by lobbyist.
mark