I was talking about interstates. But on a two lane, if that's the speed (just off the speed limit) that a driver feels comfortable with, that's fine with me. If I want to and can (see previous post

), I'll pass them.
Two-lanes are not intended for moving large volumes of traffic safely at a decent speed; that's what the interstate system is supposed to do and that is what we pay taxes to get. I may get peeved when the interstates are mis-used and I'm not getting what I paid for, but I don't take the same expectations with me to secondary roads. That would be nuts.
The distances normally traveled on two lane roads around here are not far enough that 5-10 mph is going to make much difference on how long it takes to get wherever I'm going.
New Rant :laughing::
Where I have seen two-lane traffic issues, are outlying areas that have grown around a city and the two-lane road is just over capacity serving as major feeder during commute times. It's not an interstate. People moved to a location knowing they would have to use that road. If they want to pass people shaking their fists at each other while moaning about fuel taxes--basically blaming the world for their choices--too bad.
Besides being a largely preventable situation, failing that there are fixes for those issues but they cost money. And the fixes will cost more money and be shorter-lived when no regional transportation mode planning is in place--because that would be Socialism and big expensive gubbermint don't ya know. It's much better to just keep shaking fists and moaning like a pack of asylum escapees.