Will this be tomorrow's transportation?

Status
Not open for further replies.
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #102  
Where is the compressor on a submarine?? They may just have a storage tank that's filled in port!

Seems on excersise's them fuel cell subs are hard to find despite that noisy compressor. And then there's rumours the nuclear powered types need pumps for heat dissipation.

Now I surely know little about fuel cells or submarines but your comments indicate your in the same position!

A diesel sub not operating gas compressors will be quieter than a diesel sub operating compressors. Any diesel sub rigged for quiet running will be quieter than a nuc sub even with the reactor scrammed. That reactor core has a lot of decay heat to dissipate even if on convection cooling. The stored hydrogen and oxygen used in the fuel cells when operating below the surface has to be replaced. Hence burning diesel to operate a generator to power the Electrolysis process , compress the gasses and cool the gasses.
 
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #103  
Do you think there will be a "new" way to store hydrogen ?
Thermal power plants creating hydrogen or supplying power to charge batteries is not an advantage.
Where are you going to find the energy storage density to power plains, trains and automobiles for more than 1-2 hours at a time then spend 5+ hours for a full charge without over heating the battery pack?

I am just saying that electric motor powered by battery converts more BTUs from the primary fuel be it coal, NG, crude oil etc than ICE to mechanical power.
I intend to buy an electric car. I figured that we could drive the same amount of miles for about 15% of gasoline cost at the worst case. Saving $280/month and another 140-160/year for no oil changes.
 
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation?
  • Thread Starter
#105  
A diesel sub not operating gas compressors will be quieter than a diesel sub operating compressors. Any diesel sub rigged for quiet running will be quieter than a nuc sub even with the reactor scrammed. That reactor core has a lot of decay heat to dissipate even if on convection cooling. The stored hydrogen and oxygen used in the fuel cells when operating below the surface has to be replaced. Hence burning diesel to operate a generator to power the Electrolysis process , compress the gasses and cool the gasses.

Indications are that the Sub's refuel when in port. No hydrogen production on board. Hydrogen is stored in external tanks to separate from Crew's Quarters.
 
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #106  
Indications are that the Sub's refuel when in port. No hydrogen production on board. Hydrogen is stored in external tanks to separate from Crew's Quarters.


What is the sub supposed to use for power when below snorkle depth when the H2 and O2 tanks are empty? A fuel cell sub would only be useful for patrol around a country's own domestic coast within the sight of land. A diesel/battery sub can recharge anywhere and go anywhere.
 
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation?
  • Thread Starter
#107  
What is the sub supposed to use for power when below snorkle depth when the H2 and O2 tanks are empty? A fuel cell sub would only be useful for patrol around a country's own domestic coast within the sight of land. A diesel/battery sub can recharge anywhere and go anywhere.

Go read the information. Try & educate yourself! It'll open up whole new worlds for you.

Shift work can dull the mind it is said!
 
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #108  
That's actually not the case, power plants can get better efficiency because they have a couple things that work in their favor vs internal combustion engines.

The biggest issue is waste heat, in a car you have to dump it via your radiator. However in a power plant they can have a massive heat exchanger that can capture it and use it to generate more power. Conservation of energy means that your car cannot be as efficient as a power plant that captures heat(fun fact 1 gallon of gas has ~33.4kWh so most EVs run on 1-3 gallons of gas to 100-300 miles).

Secondly cars need to work across a wide range of power bands, however a generator can sit at a single RPM and optimize for that specific band. So you'll lose some power due having a requirement to function at different speeds.

Those two things combined mean that quite a few plants exceed 50% efficiency where cars top out around 35%.

Also we have a ton of hydro up here in the PNW so we already have a nice source of cheap clean energy :).

Not really. Check your numbers again. A fossil fuels power plant runs about the same efficiency as a modern EFI car burning fossil fuel. Then don't forget to account for the transmission and all of the conversion losses of which there are several that turns into waste heat and gets nothing done. Remember the end goal is to move X amount of weight Y distance at Z speed. If you ran a business that way you'd be broke within the first year. Kinda like the mentality of saving money buy buying stuff on sale for stuff that not needed and saving yourself right into bankruptcy. Begin at the beginning and end at the end accounting for everything in between. It's the only real way to access the overall efficiency of anything.
 
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #109  
The total efficiency of the energy chain is complicated. Lets look, in example at NG. It takes energy to drill the hole in ground, process it in the gas plant (separate all gasses from the mixture so only methane is left), compress it to the pipeline pressure (1200 psi/74 bar), boost the pressure every 70-80 miles, burn it in the gas turbine (about 30% efficiency at rated load), recover some of the heat to generate steam that powers a steam turbine increasing efficiency of the generator to close 70%. If you add energy used to make the pipes, turbines, compressors and all the equipment used the numbers of total energy efficiency will be even lower.
It takes more complicated equipment and more energy to produce gasoline and diesel.
In other words ICE would convert to mechanical power (and that just my guess) perhaps only 10 % of the energy originally in the hydrocarbon used to produce the fuel.
Which ever way you look at it electric car beats the ICE in total efficiency hands down. Moreover electricity can be generated from water, wind, solar, geothermal, biogas etc. Needless to say that it will take more time and development for electric cars to be as practical and convenient as ICE powered cars. The latest models of electric cars are approaching range long enough to be practical. If the cost of the fuel rises again the acceptance of the electric cars will only accelerate.
 
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #110  
... Kinda like the mentality of saving money buy buying stuff on sale for stuff that not needed and saving yourself right into bankruptcy...

What? 'Somebody' (;)) really doesn't care if we 'save' the economy too ... the Modern American Way.

This new kind of green 'Hope and Change' is getting more complicated by the day. "You have to believe." :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2013 Chevrolet Caprice Sedan (A50324)
2013 Chevrolet...
2019 FORD F550 XL SERVICE TRUCK (A51243)
2019 FORD F550 XL...
2022 CASE TV370B SKID STEER (A51242)
2022 CASE TV370B...
2018 CATERPILLAR D8T HI-TRACK CRAWLER DOZER (A51242)
2018 CATERPILLAR...
2011 Ford F-250 Omaha Service Truck (A50323)
2011 Ford F-250...
2016 Ford Fusion Sedan (A50324)
2016 Ford Fusion...
 
Top