Will this be tomorrow's transportation?

Status
Not open for further replies.
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #163  
Are you indicating one large power generating station for Canada on either the east or west coast would be preferable to what we have now? Or maybe place it on Hudson's Bay in a more central location?


You have been noted for making comments on varying power demands have you not? Flexibility and separation may be beneficial in the long run. Sure make the required shutdowns easier and aid when natural disasters occure.

More power generating sources give the distribution system much more flexibility. Remember Quebec's ice storm or some of the total grid shutdowns?? If'n all you got is one horse and it up and dies your just plain looking at the proverbial paddle and creek! Being able to easily diversify can be very beneficial.

2 X 1500 in the middle of of an industrial heartland and high population density area puts the generation near the load. Who would be bird brained enough to put reactors as such where you want them?
Take a look at the way generation, transmission and loads were laid out before Dalton, Wynne and Justin made a mess of everything. That is how it was supposed to be.
Back in the day the 540 MW and 600MW units was all they had until the Bruce B and Darlington units went on line.
The ACR-1000 rated at 1200MW and up would have been the real deal but unfortunatly starting Oct 23 2003 the plan was to run nasty dirty industry and " dirty" generation from Ontario and Canada . By that wide eyed fanatical environmental zealot Butts. And just have office jobs and clean high tech research etc all powered with just wind, sun and hydroelectric in his perfect world. Dirty industry would be out of sight and out of mind in China etc.
World wide nuclear and coal is being pushed out of the market via being financially ruined with low wholesale electrical rates. Caused by subsidized wind, solar and natural gas lowering the wholesale rate and driving away industry with increased retail rates.
 
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation?
  • Thread Starter
#164  
Are you saying reactors cannot be located near population density? Why is this, are they not safe?
Has the Ontario distribution system been upgraded in the last few years.
 
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #166  
Are you saying reactors cannot be located near population density? Why is this, are they not safe?
Has the Ontario distribution system been upgraded in the last few years.

No, no, no. How could you come up with that conclusion ?
 
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #167  
Are you saying reactors cannot be located near population density? Why is this, are they not safe?
Has the Ontario distribution system been upgraded in the last few years.

It's not a good idea to put light water uranium fueled reactors near populated areas because they have a natural tendency to want to run wild and require high pressure containment vessels. As happened with the fiasco in Japan and Chernobyl. Molten salt like LFTRs on the other hand are throttled reactors and want to shut down on their own and require no containment vessels so should be safer to operate near populated areas.
The only reason light water reactors were so popular with the NRA & DOE was because they could produce materials for nuclear weapons from it while you could not get that stuff with thorium fueled MSRs. As with many things, it was mostly politics and we the people wound up shafted. Not all nuclear energy is bad, only some of it along with what wound up being popular at the time.
 
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #168  
Please read a newspaper once in a while. :rolleyes:

Quite possibly one of the worst possible choices for relevant information today. It's a lot like going to grammar school looking for information on calculus and higher mathematics. That old saying "the blind leading the blind" comes to mind.
 
   / Will this be tomorrow's transportation?
  • Thread Starter
#170  
Thanks dickfoster for the clarification.

No need for me to reply to several posters.

I will add that California has the start of hydrogen refuelling network so it has to be plausible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2016 WESTERN STAR 5700XE TANDEM AXLE SLEEPER (A51219)
2016 WESTERN STAR...
Ford NAA Jubilee Tractor (A52128)
Ford NAA Jubilee...
71064 (A49346)
71064 (A49346)
2011 FREIGHTLINER M2 TANDEM AXLE FLATBED TRUCK (A51222)
2011 FREIGHTLINER...
2018 Ford F-150 4x4 Crew Cab Pickup Truck (A50323)
2018 Ford F-150...
2015 Ford F-550 Godwin 184U Crew Cab Mason Dump Truck (A48081)
2015 Ford F-550...
 
Top