SandburRanch
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2010
- Messages
- 1,418
- Tractor
- NHtd75
Some charts show red oak weighing about 60lbs./cu.ft. at 70 percent moisture.
Got a little carried away...
- Thread starter IH782
- Start date
- Views: 6352
OP
IH782
Silver Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2015
- Messages
- 196
- Location
- NEPA
- Tractor
- Kubota 2650 Kubota B7800, Kubota L3901, Mahindra 2538, Mahindra 2555
Their are many variables with weight charts, they were invented to keep OSHA happy. Like I said, it could have be much lighter. Even at 60lbs it comes in at 4,665lbs.
4570Man
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2015
- Messages
- 18,519
- Location
- Crossville, TN
- Tractor
- Kubota M59, Kubota L3800, Grasshopper 428D, Topkick dump truck, 3500 dump truck, 10 ton trailer, more lighter trailers.
Water weighs 62 pounds per cubic foot and wood floats.
MossRoad
Super Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2001
- Messages
- 58,245
- Location
- South Bend, Indiana (near)
- Tractor
- Power Trac PT425 2001 Model Year
Looking4new
Super Member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2012
- Messages
- 9,947
- Location
- Northern Ontario, Canada
- Tractor
- 2012 Kioti CK27HST w/cab
I think you missed a decimal point there. 6.2 lbs/cubic foot.
rd_macgregor
Veteran Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2008
- Messages
- 1,874
- Location
- Prince Edward Island, Canada
- Tractor
- Kioti DK45SC, Kubota B2650
Nope. 62.4 #/ft3 for water. A totally fresh, wet log may float (some don't), but (for oak) isn't very much lower density than water...maybe 58 to 60 or so #/ft3.
4570Man
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2015
- Messages
- 18,519
- Location
- Crossville, TN
- Tractor
- Kubota M59, Kubota L3800, Grasshopper 428D, Topkick dump truck, 3500 dump truck, 10 ton trailer, more lighter trailers.
Nope. It's 62.4 pounds and I left off the .4 because I figured it's more of a appropriate number.
CobyRupert
Super Member
At 36" (avg) diameter = 4665 lbs.
At 38" (avg) diameter = 5198 lbs
(when using 60 lbs/cu.ft.)
CobyRupert
Super Member
Hope the "pop" was nothing.
Seeing how thread is already a bit distracted on wood density and log weights, may I also ask OP, what is the value ($) of a log like that is? As a log, and as rough cut lumber? I turned a nice oak into fire wood (many, many of those logs. I still feel guilty, but I don't think I lost too much money, compared to the time and hassle to sell one tree as logs, or get it cut up into lumber, and finding substitute for the firewood.
Seeing how thread is already a bit distracted on wood density and log weights, may I also ask OP, what is the value ($) of a log like that is? As a log, and as rough cut lumber? I turned a nice oak into fire wood (many, many of those logs. I still feel guilty, but I don't think I lost too much money, compared to the time and hassle to sell one tree as logs, or get it cut up into lumber, and finding substitute for the firewood.
RNeumann
Elite Member
When I did the weight calculator from MossRoad above I got a number less than water. To be blunt- if you are getting a weight higher than the weight of water you will need to verify your source and or math.
If the dimensions are correct and the calculator is close the log was at or near the max the loader is designed to lift- which makes sense right? In order to lift near double the FEL capacity as some charts or math have suggested you would need near double the hydraulic pressure or bigger cylinders or different geometry- right?
I'm enjoying the discussion and honestly had no idea they had log weight charts- so I'm learning too. Good luck finding the pop sound.
If the dimensions are correct and the calculator is close the log was at or near the max the loader is designed to lift- which makes sense right? In order to lift near double the FEL capacity as some charts or math have suggested you would need near double the hydraulic pressure or bigger cylinders or different geometry- right?
I'm enjoying the discussion and honestly had no idea they had log weight charts- so I'm learning too. Good luck finding the pop sound.
