AxleHub
Elite Member
Greetings MossRoad,
You wrote "I guess the reason I haven't had fuel related issues in anything in 30+ years of using nothing but E10 fuel is because I've followed good practices from the manufacturers, used sealed gas cans, only mix a gallon of 2-stroke fuel at a time, and rotate out my stored fuel a couple times per year."
In other wordsyou adapt your entire method just to babysit all of E10's problems. I don't see how that is a logical method. I can spend 20 cents a gallon more to purchase E0 87 octane instead of saving that 20 cents per gallon to use E10.
What do I get for paying 20 cents a gallon more? In my pickup using 87 octane e0 I get 2 miles to the gallon more in highway driving plus I don't get any knocking. With e10 I get 2 mpg less and some knocking or power stall in town and that happens with completely fresh fuel. I sure don't by "sealed container gas". That's several dollars a can more.
I used to have starting problems with small engine especially in winter using e10 and changed nothing but going to 87 e0 and I have none since (note I said changed nothing else like storage method etc.).
I don't need to adjust carburetors anymore because the small engines are getting consistent e0.
My point is this, you are adjusting your use style to fit the weaknesses that e10 creates.
You mentioned several links where manufacturers indicate using e10 89 octane. Would you be surprised that those same engines run equal or better on 87 octane e0 ? They will because e10 is a power robbing fuel and to run properly those engines were designed for e0 87 octane and then "adapted" to 89 octane e10 because manufacturers instructions had to adapt to fuel pump availability - not desired availability.
In addition, numerous popular autos specifically require e10 and not e12 because they can't require e0 (at least not in the U. S.).
Finally, to address the environment. Ethanol fuels create numerous environmental issues. If my truck gets 20 mpg on the highway with e10 or gets 22 mpg on the highway with e0, the environment "wins" with the e0 use. In addition, it is well known in many corn growing states that ethanol requires huge trucking requirements for farmers to deliver bulky product to the plants. In addition to substantial fuel consumption to do that, there is air pollution from the plants (smell as well as contaminants), intense road wear (as many articles can attest), and the farmers fields do not get nutrients tilled back into the soils.
Jmho
You wrote "I guess the reason I haven't had fuel related issues in anything in 30+ years of using nothing but E10 fuel is because I've followed good practices from the manufacturers, used sealed gas cans, only mix a gallon of 2-stroke fuel at a time, and rotate out my stored fuel a couple times per year."
In other wordsyou adapt your entire method just to babysit all of E10's problems. I don't see how that is a logical method. I can spend 20 cents a gallon more to purchase E0 87 octane instead of saving that 20 cents per gallon to use E10.
What do I get for paying 20 cents a gallon more? In my pickup using 87 octane e0 I get 2 miles to the gallon more in highway driving plus I don't get any knocking. With e10 I get 2 mpg less and some knocking or power stall in town and that happens with completely fresh fuel. I sure don't by "sealed container gas". That's several dollars a can more.
I used to have starting problems with small engine especially in winter using e10 and changed nothing but going to 87 e0 and I have none since (note I said changed nothing else like storage method etc.).
I don't need to adjust carburetors anymore because the small engines are getting consistent e0.
My point is this, you are adjusting your use style to fit the weaknesses that e10 creates.
You mentioned several links where manufacturers indicate using e10 89 octane. Would you be surprised that those same engines run equal or better on 87 octane e0 ? They will because e10 is a power robbing fuel and to run properly those engines were designed for e0 87 octane and then "adapted" to 89 octane e10 because manufacturers instructions had to adapt to fuel pump availability - not desired availability.
In addition, numerous popular autos specifically require e10 and not e12 because they can't require e0 (at least not in the U. S.).
Finally, to address the environment. Ethanol fuels create numerous environmental issues. If my truck gets 20 mpg on the highway with e10 or gets 22 mpg on the highway with e0, the environment "wins" with the e0 use. In addition, it is well known in many corn growing states that ethanol requires huge trucking requirements for farmers to deliver bulky product to the plants. In addition to substantial fuel consumption to do that, there is air pollution from the plants (smell as well as contaminants), intense road wear (as many articles can attest), and the farmers fields do not get nutrients tilled back into the soils.
Jmho