We think just the opposite. Around here, about 25 years ago, deer were so thick that there was no vegetation from the ground up to about 6 feet off the ground. The deer ate everything. You could look a hundred yards through the woods because there just wasn't any undergrowth anymore. So the DNR got aggressive with deer harvest numbers, and started shooting them in the state parks, too. Finally, after years of aggressive harvest, and annual park hunts, the deer population has gotten low enough for growth to return in the forests. And guess what? The turkey population has taken off. Deer are at manageable levels. The small trees and shrubs that provide shelter and forage for most animals have started growing up and we now can't see through the forest more than 15-20 feet, like it should be. You shouldn't be able to see through a forest. If you can, there's no small trees growing up to take the place of the mature ones that die. And there's no place for wildlife to live or eat.
I can't hardly walk through my woods in most places. It's thick with deer, turkey, and squirrels.
So what's the difference between your situation and ours? For one, we don't have hogs. That would be a bad thing to have to deal with. The other, people's ideas of forest and land differ from region to region. You prefer an open forest. I prefer a dense forest. To each his own. We both manage our land as we see fit, and make it the way we want it. No right or wrong there. Enjoy the place as we want it. :thumbsup: