That's the first attempt by anybody to answer it.. and after the third time asking. I won't agree or disagree that mandatory inspections are a sham; yet at least once a year somebody is looking at them who knows something about mechanics. How does an LEO "observe" that somebody's rear brakes aren't working? Stopping somebody because they have a license plate out isn't for safety reasons; rather, it's an excuse to check for other things.No, I responded to your question.
You frame this in a way that seems to suggest an answer you want.
Texas and most states have multitudes of laws about vehicle safety. Any officer who sees an unsafe vehicle can take action on the violation as per the law.
Vehicle Safety Inspections as carried out in most states are a pure sham. They have nothing to do with performing a comprehensive safety inspection.
People who are responsible are going to keep their vehicles safe. Those who are irresponsible are not going to be deterred by the requirements it seems you would like to impose.
.
Once again, you didn稚 田ite any cases or accidents. You mentioned some anecdotes without any actual support for your unsubstantiated, self serving argumentative conclusions.
I would say that a frame failing, Brake lines pinched off because the wheel cylinder was leaking, or a kid's foot getting destroyed because it went through the rusty floorboards after the truck suddenly veered off the road is more than an anecdote. I will state further that if you don't see a problem with mounting tube type tires without a tube, I hope that somebody else does your mechanical work for you. "Self serving conclusions?" I was asking questions, trying to determine if those states without inspections had ways of addressing unsafe vehicles or if driving down your roads was just a crap shoot. Lastly. I posted quotes with corresponding links which indicate that there really is no way of knowing how many accidents are caused by mechanical failure because nobody tracks it; yet North Carolina is a state which implemented them because at the time there were, indeed a lot of accidents caused by unsafe vehicles.
You will note that I did not cherry pick links which supported what you purport to be my "unsubstantiated, self serving argumentative conclusions. " Rather, (unlike most posters who are merely posting what they think is right) I posted what I could find on the subject and tried to actually start some real dialogue. I find it ironic that I at least tried to posts to support my viewpoint, which you haven't done; yet you dismiss them out of hand.